From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jon.medhurst@linaro.org (Jon Medhurst (Tixy)) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:06:08 +0000 Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: Add generic instruction opcode manipulation helpers In-Reply-To: <20111129104255.GA2829@localhost.localdomain> References: <1322220493-3251-1-git-send-email-dave.martin@linaro.org> <20111128174122.GG2465@localhost.localdomain> <1322508033.2354.86.camel@computer2> <20111129104255.GA2829@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1322575568.4500.39.camel@linaro1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 10:42 +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > Do you care about being to able to set probes in Thumb user code when > the kernel is not Thumb-2, or do you simply not support that scenario > at all? (Thinking about, I'm guessing we don't currently support that?) kprobes are only designed to probe kernel code, that's what the 'k' stands for. ;-) -- Tixy