From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dwalker@fifo99.com (Daniel Walker)
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 12:25:47 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: msm: Remove MSM7x00 support
In-Reply-To: <20111201201950.GE9581@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1322699344-28422-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org>
 <1322752657.3704.2.camel@m0nster>
 <20111201181736.GA13182@huya.qualcomm.com>
 <1322764745.3704.9.camel@m0nster>
 <20111201192705.GA23641@huya.qualcomm.com>
 <1322767992.3704.13.camel@m0nster>
 <20111201194353.GA24293@huya.qualcomm.com>
 <20111201201950.GE9581@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <1322771147.3704.21.camel@m0nster>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 20:19 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Now, the obvious question to ask now is this: as you sent your question,
> and Daniel obviously objects, was Daniel one of your respondants?  If
> not, then he carries some of the blame for this patch being created
> in the first place by having missed the email/not replied/etc.
> 

What if the people using the hardware aren't even on the list ? It's not
their fault is it?

Daniel