From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:59:58 +0530
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add Qualcomm MSM ADM DMAEngine driver
In-Reply-To: <4F28D8A2.9050605@codeaurora.org>
References: <1325854052-21402-1-git-send-email-kumarrav@codeaurora.org>
 <1326807902.1540.116.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <4F195E4C.6080805@codeaurora.org>
 <1327066287.517.4.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <4F1D4052.3070701@codeaurora.org>
 <1327326713.517.32.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <4F1FFF7E.3000802@codeaurora.org>
 <1327911315.1527.8.camel@vkoul-udesk3>  <4F278341.4020600@codeaurora.org>
 <1327990151.1527.80.camel@vkoul-udesk3>  <4F28D8A2.9050605@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <1328084998.1610.11.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 11:46 +0530, Ravi Kumar V wrote:
> On 1/31/2012 11:39 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:29 +0530, Ravi Kumar V wrote:
> >>> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/24/275
> >>> [2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/26/405
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes if we follow the above RFC and add extra context parameter also
> >> in
> >> device_prep_dma_sg()&  device_prep_interleaved_dma() then it supports
> >> our hardware and our work will be completed.
> >>
> >> can we follow above RFC and implement our driver.
> >> Is above RFC finalized and included in mainline?
> > Alexandre will post an updated one soon, but the idea is same
> >
> 
> Can we add extra parameter context to device_prep_dma_sg() & 
> device_prep_interleaved_dma() API's and implement our driver.
So what one are you going to use...

>>From the description sounds like you need interleaved API but with
changes to make it interleaved in both src and dtsn, right?
Then why prep_dma_sg?


-- 
~Vinod