From: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl (Peter Zijlstra)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Scheduler idle notifiers and users
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:09:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1329322147.2293.145.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120215160028.GD27825@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 16:00 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > A third possibility is to self-IPI and take it from there.. assuming
> > these platforms can actually self-IPI.
>
> Even if there was an IPI (not talking about SMP anyway) I'm not sure
> what good it would be. We can (and do) get an IRQ from the LCD
> controller when its shutdown is complete, but that would have to be
> somehow propagated back up to the cpufreq code. And the cpufreq code
> would have to know that the LCD controller was alive and therefore had
> to be waited for. All sounds rather yucky to me.
If can self-ipi from the scheduler context (which has IRQs disabled),
once you get to the ipi handler your scheduler locks are gone and you
can queue a worklet or wake some kthread to do all the sleeping stuff.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-15 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-08 1:39 [PATCH RFC 0/4] Scheduler idle notifiers and users Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-08 1:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: Introduce idle notifiers API Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-08 1:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: Wire up idle notifiers Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-08 1:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpufreq: New 'interactive' governor Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-08 23:00 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-02-09 0:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-08 1:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: Move leds idle start/stop calls to sched idle notifiers Anton Vorontsov
2012-02-08 3:05 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] Scheduler idle notifiers and users Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-08 20:23 ` Dave Jones
2012-02-08 21:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-02-09 7:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-11 3:15 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-02-11 14:39 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-11 14:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-11 15:33 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-15 13:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-15 16:04 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-12 21:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-02-11 14:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-02-14 23:20 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-02-15 13:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-15 14:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-15 15:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-15 16:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-15 16:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-02-16 3:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-02-16 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-17 9:00 ` Dominik Brodowski
2012-02-20 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-21 12:38 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2012-02-21 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-21 13:31 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2012-02-21 14:52 ` Amit Kucheria
2012-02-21 17:06 ` Pantelis Antoniou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1329322147.2293.145.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).