From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: t-kristo@ti.com (Tero Kristo) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:19:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCHv3 4/6] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Enable IO Wake up In-Reply-To: <87sjhsdk2y.fsf@ti.com> References: <1330525621-29836-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <1330525621-29836-5-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <4F4F1CBA.7040502@ti.com> <87sjhsdk2y.fsf@ti.com> Message-ID: <1330679940.2116.95.camel@sokoban> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 14:37 -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Rajendra Nayak writes: > > > On Wednesday 29 February 2012 07:56 PM, Tero Kristo wrote: > >> From: Vishwanath BS > >> > >> Enable IO Wake up for OMAP3 as part of PM Init. Currently this has been > >> managed in cpuidle path which is not the right place. Subsequent patch > >> will remove IO Daisy chain handling in cpuidle path once daisy chain is > >> handled as part of hwmod mux. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Vishwanath BS > >> Tested-by: Govindraj.R > >> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo > >> --- > >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 4 ++++ > >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c > >> index e97ec3f..e6c2d39 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c > >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c > >> @@ -793,6 +793,10 @@ static int __init omap3_pm_init(void) > >> goto err1; > >> } > >> > >> + if (omap3_has_io_wakeup()) > >> + omap2_prm_set_mod_reg_bits(OMAP3430_EN_IO_MASK, WKUP_MOD, > >> + PM_WKEN); > > > > On OMAP4 this GLOBAL IO chain enable happens as part of the trigger > > function itself, it might make sense to do that for OMAP3 too to avoid > > similar issues as seen on OMAP4 when the GLOBAL switch is enabled too > > late in boot. The best however would be to get rid of it in the trigger > > function and enable this early during PM init, but I am not sure whats > > a good place to do this 'early' enough. > > What about the subsys_initcall() that's already in the prm*.c files? > > IMO, the global one-time init doesn't belong in the trigger function > because there's no need to do the extra PRM read/write when it should be > a one-shot init. This sounds good to me at least, I can change the patches to work like this, Rajendra? -Tero