From: coelho@ti.com (Luciano Coelho)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: code consolidation for 3.4
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 20:47:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1331232433.18015.69.camel@cumari> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sjhjaqyi.fsf@ti.com>
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 10:27 -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Hi Luca,
Hey Kevin,
Thanks for your reply! :)
> "Coelho, Luciano" <coelho@ti.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > I can't get ttyO2 wakeup to work on my Blaze with 3.3-rc5. It works
> > fine with 3.2.
>
> I assume you mean wakeup from system-wide suspend (echo mem > /sys/power/state)?
Yes, that's what I meant.
> Are you enabling UART wakeups?
>
> They are disabled by default, so you need to:
>
> echo enabled > /sys/devices/platform/omap/omap_uart.2/tty/ttyO2/power/wakeup
No, I was actually not enabling the UART wakeups. But I tried it now
but it still doesn't work. :(
> It may work in v3.2 due to the fact that the UART runtime PM had the
> unintended side-effect of essentially disabling MPU and CORE PM. With
> that bug fixed and MPU & CORE actually hitting low power states, you'll
> need to ensure UART wakeups are enabled.
>
> If you're already enabling wakeups and this still isn't working, try
> adding 'no_console_suspend' to the kernel cmdline, try a suspend/resume
> and post the console output.
I have no_console_suspend in bootargs. Without it, it didn't work with
3.2 either.
This is what I get when I suspend with "echo mem > /sys/power/state":
[ 128.534271] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
[ 129.948364] PM: Preparing system for mem sleep
[ 129.957061] Freezing user space processes ...
[ 129.961761] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/freezer.h:46
[ 129.969177] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 770, name: udevd
[ 129.977813] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[ 129.977813] irq event stamp: 0
[ 129.985168] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null)
[ 129.991485] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<c004233c>] copy_process+0x3ec/0x1050
[ 129.996520] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c004233c>] copy_process+0x3ec/0x1050
[ 130.005218] softirqs last disabled at (0): [< (null)>] (null)
[ 130.011291] [<c001e204>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x148) from [<c0502fdc>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24)
[ 130.018829] [<c0502fdc>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<c00779d0>] (__might_sleep+0x130/0x134)
[ 130.030670] [<c00779d0>] (__might_sleep+0x130/0x134) from [<c0018998>] (do_signal+0x54/0x600)
[ 130.031738] [<c0018998>] (do_signal+0x54/0x600) from [<c0018fa4>] (do_notify_resume+0x60/0x6c)
[ 130.049804] [<c0018fa4>] (do_notify_resume+0x60/0x6c) from [<c00154e4>] (work_pending+0x24/0x28)
[ 130.067138] (elapsed 0.10 seconds) done.
[ 130.070648] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.02 seconds) done.
[ 130.101165] PM: Entering mem sleep
[ 130.120056] PM: suspend of devices complete after 9.646 msecs
[ 130.127716] PM: late suspend of devices complete after 7.662 msecs
[ 130.134246] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
[ 130.139953] CPU1: shutdown
The "sleeping function" BUG is that known bug I already complained about
some time ago. I get it all the time and, in general, it doesn't really
hurt (I guess I'm lucky most of the times not to hit a race-condition).
--
Cheers,
Luca.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-08 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-02 9:38 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: code consolidation for 3.4 Paul Walmsley
2012-02-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: share clkdms_setup() across OMAP2, 3, 4 Paul Walmsley
2012-02-02 9:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: share some suspend-related functions " Paul Walmsley
2012-02-02 11:25 ` [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: code consolidation for 3.4 Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-02 18:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-02 18:40 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-02 20:29 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-08 12:21 ` Coelho, Luciano
2012-03-08 18:18 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-08 18:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-08 18:47 ` Luciano Coelho [this message]
2012-03-08 18:55 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-08 19:05 ` Luciano Coelho
2012-03-08 21:21 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-09 6:15 ` Luciano Coelho
2012-03-09 15:23 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1331232433.18015.69.camel@cumari \
--to=coelho@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).