* [PATCH v2 0/2] ata: AT91 ata driver requires specific platforms [not found] <1331405617-4053-1-git-send-email-alan@signal11.us> @ 2012-03-10 21:36 ` Alan Ott 2012-03-10 21:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA Alan Ott 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Alan Ott @ 2012-03-10 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Based on suggestions from Ben Dooks, This patch now adds an AT91_HAS_PATA kconfig item and the AT91 CPUs which have PATA now select it. The AT91 PATA driver how depends on this kconfig item. Ben, let me know if this is what you had in mind. Alan Ott (2): ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA ata: AT91 ata driver requires AT91_HAS_PATA arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++ drivers/ata/Kconfig | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA 2012-03-10 21:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ata: AT91 ata driver requires specific platforms Alan Ott @ 2012-03-10 21:38 ` Alan Ott 2012-03-11 18:38 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Alan Ott @ 2012-03-10 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Not all at91 chips have PATA, this parameter will identify which chips do. The determining of which chips support PATA was done by Arnd Bergmann. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Alan Ott <alan@signal11.us> CC: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> --- arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++ 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig index 71feb00..9eeeabe 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ config AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET config AT91_SAM9G45_RESET bool +config AT91_HAS_PATA + bool + menu "Atmel AT91 System-on-Chip" choice @@ -46,6 +49,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91SAM9260 select HAVE_AT91_USART5 select HAVE_NET_MACB select AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET + select AT91_HAS_PATA config ARCH_AT91SAM9261 bool "AT91SAM9261" @@ -54,6 +58,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91SAM9261 select HAVE_FB_ATMEL select HAVE_AT91_DBGU0 select AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET + select AT91_HAS_PATA config ARCH_AT91SAM9G10 bool "AT91SAM9G10" @@ -62,6 +67,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91SAM9G10 select HAVE_AT91_DBGU0 select HAVE_FB_ATMEL select AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET + select AT91_HAS_PATA config ARCH_AT91SAM9263 bool "AT91SAM9263" @@ -71,6 +77,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91SAM9263 select HAVE_NET_MACB select HAVE_AT91_DBGU1 select AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET + select AT91_HAS_PATA config ARCH_AT91SAM9RL bool "AT91SAM9RL" @@ -80,6 +87,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91SAM9RL select HAVE_FB_ATMEL select HAVE_AT91_DBGU0 select AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET + select AT91_HAS_PATA config ARCH_AT91SAM9G20 bool "AT91SAM9G20" @@ -91,6 +99,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91SAM9G20 select HAVE_AT91_USART5 select HAVE_NET_MACB select AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET + select AT91_HAS_PATA config ARCH_AT91SAM9G45 bool "AT91SAM9G45" @@ -101,6 +110,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91SAM9G45 select HAVE_NET_MACB select HAVE_AT91_DBGU1 select AT91_SAM9G45_RESET + select AT91_HAS_PATA config ARCH_AT91CAP9 bool "AT91CAP9" @@ -110,6 +120,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91CAP9 select HAVE_NET_MACB select HAVE_AT91_DBGU1 select AT91_SAM9G45_RESET + select AT91_HAS_PATA config ARCH_AT91X40 bool "AT91x40" -- 1.7.0.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA 2012-03-10 21:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA Alan Ott @ 2012-03-11 18:38 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD 2012-03-11 21:36 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD @ 2012-03-11 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 16:38 Sat 10 Mar , Alan Ott wrote: > Not all at91 chips have PATA, this parameter will identify which > chips do. The determining of which chips support PATA was done > by Arnd Bergmann. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Signed-off-by: Alan Ott <alan@signal11.us> > CC: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> > --- > arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > index 71feb00..9eeeabe 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ config AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET > config AT91_SAM9G45_RESET > bool > > +config AT91_HAS_PATA > + bool what is the need for this? As we switch to DT, I don't want to track the soc list in the Kconfig anymore if the soc support the PATA will be describe in the DT Best Regards, J. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA 2012-03-11 18:38 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD @ 2012-03-11 21:36 ` Arnd Bergmann 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2012-03-11 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Sunday 11 March 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > > index 71feb00..9eeeabe 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig > > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ config AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET > > config AT91_SAM9G45_RESET > > bool > > > > +config AT91_HAS_PATA > > + bool > what is the need for this? > > As we switch to DT, I don't want to track the soc list in the Kconfig anymore > if the soc support the PATA will be describe in the DT > When I originally wrote the patch, I was hitting build errors when trying to enable the at91 pata driver on socs that don't have the right declarations in their headers. If that has been resolved in a better way already, this patch can be dropped. Arnd ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-11 21:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1331405617-4053-1-git-send-email-alan@signal11.us>
2012-03-10 21:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ata: AT91 ata driver requires specific platforms Alan Ott
2012-03-10 21:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: AT91: Add parameter for AT91_HAS_PATA Alan Ott
2012-03-11 18:38 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-03-11 21:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).