From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (Tomi Valkeinen) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:08:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 7/7] ARM: OMAP2+: Mark omap_hsmmc_init and omap_mux related functions as __init In-Reply-To: <1329997247-27342-8-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> References: <1329997247-27342-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <1329997247-27342-8-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> Message-ID: <1332148116.2144.1.camel@deskari> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 17:10 +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > From: Tony Lindgren > > Now that omap hsmmc init is split into two functions, it's safe > to mark omap_hsmmc_init and omap_mux related functions to __init. > > This basically reverts the following fixes for the case where > TWL was compiled as a module: > > a98f77b (ARM: omap: fix section mismatch warning for sdp3430_twl_gpio_setup()) > 8930b4e (ARM: omap: fix section mismatch warnings in mux.c caused by hsmmc.c) > > Additionally it fixes up the remaining section warnings for > all callers of omap_mux functions. I only now noticed this patch. This breaks DSI, as the DSI muxing functions are used during runtime and cannot be marked as __init. Shall I make a new patch for dss tree that fixes this? Tomi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: