From: eric.dumazet@gmail.com (Eric Dumazet)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC] Simplify the Linux kernel by reducing its state space
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:00:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1333227608.2325.4054.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120331163321.GA15809@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 00:33 +0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Although there have been numerous complaints about the complexity of
> parallel programming (especially over the past 5-10 years), the plain
> truth is that the incremental complexity of parallel programming over
> that of sequential programming is not as large as is commonly believed.
> Despite that you might have heard, the mind-numbing complexity of modern
> computer systems is not due so much to there being multiple CPUs, but
> rather to there being any CPUs at all. In short, for the ultimate in
> computer-system simplicity, the optimal choice is NR_CPUS=0.
>
> This commit therefore limits kernel builds to zero CPUs. This change
> has the beneficial side effect of rendering all kernel bugs harmless.
> Furthermore, this commit enables additional beneficial changes, for
> example, the removal of those parts of the kernel that are not needed
> when there are zero CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
Hmm... I believe you could go one step forward and allow negative values
as well. Antimatter was proven to exist after all.
Hint : nr_cpu_ids is an "int", not an "unsigned int"
Bonus: Existing bugs become "must have" features.
Of course there is no hurry and this can wait 365 days.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-31 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-31 16:33 [PATCH RFC] Simplify the Linux kernel by reducing its state space Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-31 16:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-03-31 16:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <CAHrUA35Bz68DtP-Znr=-+U+6P9CONXzN=9JdMXRfRwmVV9fy=Q@mail.gmail.com>
2012-03-31 20:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-31 20:15 ` Linas Vepstas
2012-03-31 20:25 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-03-31 20:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-31 21:00 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-03-31 21:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-31 22:19 ` Lorenz Kolb
2012-03-31 22:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-31 22:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-01 1:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-01 17:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-01 18:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-01 10:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-01 18:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1333227608.2325.4054.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox