From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: benh@kernel.crashing.org (Benjamin Herrenschmidt)
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:38:47 +1000
Subject: [PATCH v5 06/27] irq_domain/powerpc: eliminate irq_map; use
 irq_alloc_desc() instead
In-Reply-To: <20120402225223.GN24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1329383368-12122-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
 <1329383368-12122-7-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
 <m2iphj3zxr.fsf@igel.home> <m2hax2qeqs.fsf@igel.home>
 <20120402202848.1EB833E02A7@localhost>
 <20120402215524.GM24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <1333406005.30734.61.camel@pasglop>
 <20120402225223.GN24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <1333409927.30734.62.camel@pasglop>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 23:52 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> If we want to fix it a better way, then sure, that'll be good.  But
> what
> we shouldn't do is re-introduce one regression to fix a different
> regression.
> 
> So, Thomas, what do you think about providing a way that a disabled
> interrupt could have its pending status cleared such that when it's
> enabled, any queued events are ignored?  Maybe an
> enable_and_clear_irq() ? 

Ok. Doesn't matter anyway, this shouldn't be the problem in this
specific case. IE. we shouldn't be setting that interrupt to NONE.

We should have parsed the device-tree and set the trigger appropriately.

Cheers,
Ben.