From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: t-kristo@ti.com (Tero Kristo)
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:46:55 +0300
Subject: [PATCHv4 4/8] ARM: OMAP4: hwmod: flag hwmods/modules
 supporting module level context status
In-Reply-To: <4F957ACD.2040103@ti.com>
References: <1334913591-26312-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com>
 <1334913591-26312-5-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com>
 <4F957ACD.2040103@ti.com>
Message-ID: <1335278815.2149.93.camel@sokoban>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 10:52 -0500, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Tero,
> 
> On 04/20/2012 04:19 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> > From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
> > 
> > On OMAP4 most modules/hwmods support module level context status. On
> > OMAP3 and earlier, we relyed on the power domain level context status.
> > Identify all such modules using a 'HWMOD_CONTEXT_REG' flag, all such
> > hwmods already have a valid 'context_offs' populated in .prcm structure.
> 
> Is it necessary to add another flag? Can't we just check if context_offs
> is non-zero? Would save adding a lot more lines to an already large file
> :-)

Actually one of the older versions of this patch was just checking
against a non-zero value, but it was decided to be changed as
potentially the context_offs can be zero even if it is a valid offset.

-Tero