From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dedekind1@gmail.com (Artem Bityutskiy) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:00:56 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ubi: introduce ubi->bad_peb_limit In-Reply-To: <20120719091600.7d55dadb@pixies.home.jungo.com> References: <1341389164-24409-1-git-send-email-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> <1341389164-24409-2-git-send-email-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> <1342608053.7530.11.camel@brekeke> <20120719091600.7d55dadb@pixies.home.jungo.com> Message-ID: <1343653256.1513.6.camel@kyv> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 09:16 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:40:53 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > I've also amended the Kconfig text a tiny bit and dropped the defconfig > > changes - let's have them separately as a single patch at the end of the > > series. > > Wouldn't having the defconfig change as the last patch break things for > those defconfigs that had explicitly set CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_RESERVE > other than the default? OK, fair enough, but let's have it as a 2 separate patches anyway. It is not a big deal to first change the defconfig, and then actually add the new option. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: