public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (Tomi Valkeinen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] ARM: omap: hwmod: get rid of all omap_clk_get_by_name usage
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:42:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1346344933.2327.43.camel@deskari> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503F5517.4010100@ti.com>

On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 13:57 +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> On 08/30/2012 10:39 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 August 2012 05:45 AM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com>  wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c
> >>> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c
> >>> index d7f55e4..a3831a2 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c
> >>> @@ -3156,6 +3156,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap44xx_clks[] = {
> >>>          CLK(NULL,       "dss_tv_clk",&dss_tv_clk,    CK_443X),
> >>>          CLK(NULL,       "dss_48mhz_clk",&dss_48mhz_clk, CK_443X),
> >>>          CLK(NULL,       "dss_dss_clk",&dss_dss_clk,   CK_443X),
> >>> +       CLK(NULL,       "dss_fck",&dss_fck,       CK_443X),
> >>>          CLK("omapdss_dss",      "ick",&dss_fck,       CK_443X),
> >>
> >> Is it right to re-use dss_fck for the "ick" here?  I think it is due
> >> to omap4 modulemode stuff but I don't have DM in front of me and
> >> wanted a double-check...
> > 
> > yes, its because of the wierdness of DSS clocks where a so-called
> > optional clock is actually a function clock.
> 
> Not only, it is a hack to allow the DSS to be enabled whenever a DSS
> submodule has to be enabled. Since they are sharing the ick, it will
> enable the modulemode when the DISPC will be enabled.
> 
> That hack should disappear as soon as the DSS will be able to handle the
> PM dependency between DSS submodules and the DSS itself using pm_runtime
> parent/child link.
> And then we will have to remove this fake ick modulemode clock node and
> let hwmod handle that properly.
> 
> Tomi already cleaned the DSS part, I guess it should be upstreamed soon,
> if this is not already the case.

This is in 3.5. omapdss_dss is now the parent for the rest of the dss
submodules, and runtime PM is being used.

I think we should now revisit this dss clock handling to see if there
are any other changes required in the omapdss side, but I hope they are
already according to our discussions and correct.

 Tomi

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120830/1a379099/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-30 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-29  8:56 [PATCH v4 0/3] Prepare for OMAP2+ movement to Common Clk Rajendra Nayak
2012-08-29  8:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ARM: omap: clk: add clk_prepare and clk_unprepare Rajendra Nayak
2012-08-30  0:03   ` Turquette, Mike
2012-08-29  8:56 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ARM: omap: hwmod: get rid of all omap_clk_get_by_name usage Rajendra Nayak
2012-08-30  0:08   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-30  8:37     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-08-30  0:15   ` Turquette, Mike
2012-08-30  8:39     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-08-30 11:57       ` Benoit Cousson
2012-08-30 16:42         ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2012-08-31  6:23           ` Archit Taneja
2012-08-31  7:15             ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-31  8:20               ` Archit Taneja
2012-08-31  8:27                 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-08-31  8:28                   ` Archit Taneja
2012-10-05  9:46                     ` OMAP4 clock/pm fixes [was: " Archit Taneja
2012-10-05 12:20                       ` Benoit Cousson
2012-10-05 12:29                         ` Archit Taneja
2012-10-05 12:37                           ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-10-05 13:20                             ` Archit Taneja
2012-10-05 13:31                               ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-10-05 13:46                                 ` Archit Taneja
2012-10-05 13:51                               ` Benoit Cousson
2012-09-22 18:55   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-24  5:09     ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-08-29  8:56 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: clock: Remove all direct dereferencing of struct clk Rajendra Nayak
2012-08-30 20:56 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Prepare for OMAP2+ movement to Common Clk Paul Walmsley
2012-08-31  5:03   ` Vaibhav Hiremath

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1346344933.2327.43.camel@deskari \
    --to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox