From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dedekind1@gmail.com (Artem Bityutskiy) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:50:33 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] clk: Make the managed clk functions generically available In-Reply-To: <504F4E36.20309@metafoo.de> References: <1347202862-1617-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> <20120909235059.GA2643@sirena.org.uk> <20120910001524.GL13739@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120910002020.GB16249@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120910003913.GM13739@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <504F4E36.20309@metafoo.de> Message-ID: <1347375033.27206.3.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 16:44 +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 09/10/2012 02:39 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:20:21AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote: > >>[...] > >> OK, that's what I'd thought was going on - it was the fact that you'd > >> just acked the patch rather than asked for it to go to the patch tracker > >> or something which made me wonder if things had changed. > > > > I kind'a forgot because it's been soo long since I took any of those > > patches... > > Ok, what's the plan? Should I add this patch to the patch tracker? I'd propose to send it to Linus for v3.6 even. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: