From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@prisktech.co.nz (Tony Prisk) Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:50:58 +0000 Subject: [PATCHv5 9/9] arm: vt8500: clk: Add Common Clock Framework support In-Reply-To: <20120911175541.20289.95694@nucleus> References: <1346626896-23070-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> <20120910211209.20289.6795@nucleus> <1347337955.2134.3.camel@gitbox> <20120911175541.20289.95694@nucleus> Message-ID: <1347396847.2141.1.camel@gitbox> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 10:55 -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Tony Prisk (2012-09-10 21:32:35) > > On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 14:12 -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > > > Quoting Tony Prisk (2012-09-02 16:01:36) > > > > This patch adds common clock framework support for arch-vt8500. > > > > Support for PLL and device clocks on VT8500, WM8505 and WM8650 > > > > are included. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk > > > > --- > > > > Changes made as per Mike's review. > > > > Split endisable() into enable/disable. > > > > Style tidy up - remove extra blank lines. > > > > > > Hi Tony, > > > > > > This looks good. I've taken it into clk-next for some testing. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Mike > > > > Presumably this patch wouldn't apply cleanly unless you also added patch > > 6/9. Can you let me know how you handled it so I can work with Arnd to > > get all the other patches in through arm-soc. > > > > I see no dependency between patch #9 and #6. This patch simply > introduces a new C file and adds an entry into drivers/clk/Makefile. Am > I missing something? > > Also, I did not push my clk-next branch out publicly last night with > this change so it is no problem for me to drop it. Would you prefer the > whole series go through arm-soc? If so this patch has my: > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette > > Regards, > Mike > > > Regards, > > Tony P Mike, Sorry - I got that backwards - patch 6 has a dependency on this patch. It would definitely be easier for the whole lot to go through arm-soc since you're okay with that. Thanks for your time. Regards Tony P