From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pawel.moll@arm.com (Pawel Moll) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:24:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm: introduce a DTS for Xen unprivileged virtual machines In-Reply-To: References: <1348076658-4511-1-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <1348143533.26501.28.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <201209201327.45802.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <1348151074.11116.126.camel@hornet> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 15:11 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > It's not much different in the end, but I think I'd rather make the > > compatible list in the device tree "xen,xenvm-4.2", "xen,xenvm" without > > listing "arm,vexpress", but then adding "xen,xenvm" to the list of > > compatible devices in the vexpress kernel code. > > That's a very good idea, I'll do that. Yep, this would work with me as well. And I'm sure we can make the "arm,vexpress,memory-map" bit unnecessary as well - have a look into it, and I'll help you as much as I can. And then, if your "reference" DTS is to be merged, it won't be called vexpress-*.dts, so I will not have to decide whether to take it in or not :-) Cheers! Pawe?