From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pawel.moll@arm.com (Pawel Moll) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:09:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4] hwmon: Versatile Express hwmon driver In-Reply-To: <20120924155947.GA14060@roeck-us.net> References: <1348246591-2409-1-git-send-email-mail@pawelmoll.com> <20120924155947.GA14060@roeck-us.net> Message-ID: <1348502972.27071.16.camel@hornet> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 16:59 +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 05:56:31PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: > > From: Pawel Moll > > > > hwmon framework driver for Versatile Express sensors, providing > > information about board level voltage (only when regulator driver > > is not configured), currents, temperature and power/energy usage. > > Labels for the values can be defined as DT properties. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll > > After my concern was clarified ... > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck Thanks a lot! > I assume this will go upstream through the arm tree ? I was planning to push the subsystem patches (hwmon, regulator etc.) through respective maintainers, so through your tree - the driver depends on VEXPRESS_CONFIG so won't cause any build issues before the infrastructure is in place. Of course if you'd rather see it go through arm-soc, I'll add it to that branch. Just let me know what is your preference. Cheers! Pawel