From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: vinod.koul@linux.intel.com (Vinod Koul)
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:05:01 +0530
Subject: [PATCH V6 2/2] dmaengine: add helper function to request a
 slave DMA channel
In-Reply-To: <5060DDEB.4000600@ti.com>
References: <1347662517-4210-1-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com>
 <1347662517-4210-3-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com>
 <1347852805.1943.130.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <201209171159.27359.arnd@arndb.de>
 <20120917223619.GC12445@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <1347938035.1943.162.camel@vkoul-udesk3>  <5060DDEB.4000600@ti.com>
Message-ID: <1348547701.1943.190.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 17:25 -0500, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > For DT bindings, I think the binding itself shouldn't change based on my
> > work but I would like these same bindings to help build the DMA engine
> > code mappings.
> > 
> > Now would it make sense to NOT merge these changes for 3.7 and postpone
> > to 3.8. I can host these patches on a topic branch and merge them when
> > we are ready. I plan to spend some good amount of time on my work this
> > week so we should be ready pretty soon.
> > One these changes are merged, users can start moving to this scheme.
> 
> I just wanted to see how things are progressing your side. Did you
> create a topic branch for this? If so let me know where I can find it, I
> did not find a branch on your infradead git tree.
> 
> I wanted to pull in the latest patches for some testing. 
Sorry for delay, I had everything ready, but couldn't manage to commit
and push. I have pushed to topic/dmaengine_dt, it is pushing out now...

This has your two patches, my fix for build breakage, and Matt's typo
patch. This is based on my next.

-- 
~Vinod