Re: [PATCH] drm/atomic-helpers: remove legacy_cursor_update hacks

["Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥)" <Jason-JH.Lin@mediatek.com>]

On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 19:17 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>  	 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>  On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:09:05AM +0000, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> > Hi Maxime, Daniel,
> > 
> > We encountered similar issue with mediatek SoCs.
> > 
> > We have found that in drm_atomic_helper_commit_rpm(), when
> disabling
> > the cursor plane, the old_state->legacy_cursor_update in
> > drm_atomic_wait_for_vblank() is set to true.
> > As the result, we are not actually waiting for a vlbank to wait for
> our
> > hardware to close the cursor plane. Subsequently, the execution
> > proceeds to drm_atomic_helper_cleanup_planes() to  free the cursor
> > buffer. This can lead to use-after-free issues with our hardware.
> > 
> > Could you please apply this patch to fix our problem?
> > Or are there any considerations for not applying this patch?
> 
> Mostly it needs someone to collect a pile of acks/tested-by and then
> land
> it.
> 

Got it. I would add tested-by tag for mediatek SoC.

> I'd be _very_ happy if someone else can take care of that ...
> 
> There's also the potential issue that it might slow down some of the
> legacy X11 use-cases that really needed a non-blocking cursor, but I
> think
> all the drivers where this matters have switched over to the async
> plane
> update stuff meanwhile. So hopefully that's good.
> 

I think all the drivers should have switched to async plane update.

Can we add the checking condition to see if atomic_async_update/check
function are implemented?

Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin

> Cheers, Sima
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Jason-JH.Lin
> > 
> > On Tue, 2023-03-07 at 15:56 +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 12:12:13PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > The stuff never really worked, and leads to lots of fun because
> it
> > > > out-of-order frees atomic states. Which upsets KASAN, among
> other
> > > > things.
> > > > 
> > > > For async updates we now have a more solid solution with the
> > > > ->atomic_async_check and ->atomic_async_commit hooks. Support
> for
> > > > that
> > > > for msm and vc4 landed. nouveau and i915 have their own commit
> > > > routines, doing something similar.
> > > > 
> > > > For everyone else it's probably better to remove the use-after-
> free
> > > > bug, and encourage folks to use the async support instead. The
> > > > affected drivers which register a legacy cursor plane and don't
> > > > either
> > > > use the new async stuff or their own commit routine are:
> amdgpu,
> > > > atmel, mediatek, qxl, rockchip, sti, sun4i, tegra, virtio, and
> > > > vmwgfx.
> > > > 
> > > > Inspired by an amdgpu bug report.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for submitting that patch. It's been in the downstream RPi
> > > tree
> > > for a while, so I'd really like it to be merged eventually :)
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
> > > 
> > > Maxime
> 
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel