* [PATCH v4 0/3] OMAP GPMC DT bindings @ 2012-11-19 15:29 Daniel Mack 2012-11-19 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mtd: omap-nand: pass device_node in platform data Daniel Mack ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Daniel Mack @ 2012-11-19 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel This is a series of patches to support GPMC peripherals on OMAP boards. Depends on Linus' master + omap-next (branch omap-for-v3.8/cleanup-headers-gpmc) The only supported peripheral for now is NAND, but other types would be easy to add. Version 2 addresses details pointed out by Jon Hunter, Afzal Mohammed and Rob Herring: - add "reg" and "ti,hwmod" properties to Documentation - use generic of_mtd functions and the property names defined by them, namely "nand-bus-width" and "nand-ecc-mode" - reduce the default register space size in the Documentation to 8K, as found in the hwmod code - switch to a DT layout based on ranges and address translation. Although this property is not currently looked at as long as the handling code still uses the runtime calculation methods, we now have these values in the bindings, eventually allowing us to switch the implementation with less pain. Version 3 includes fixes pointed out by Jon Hunter: - better documentation of the 'ranges' property to describe the fact that it's representing the CS lines - GPMC_CS_CONFIGx -> GPMC_CONFIGx in comments - drop interrupt-parent from example bindings - add of_node_put() at the end of the child iteration Version 4 fixes compilation for !CONFIG_MTD_NAND and includes more details from Jon Hunter and Avinash, Philip: - Add "num-cs" and "num-waitpins" properties, which will eventually be used to get rid of GPMC_CS_NUM - Better description of generic nand DT properties - Dropped patch 3/4 as an equivalent fix was already merged - Added ti,nand-ecc-use-elm property Daniel Mack (3): mtd: omap-nand: pass device_node in platform data ARM: OMAP: gpmc: enable hwecc for AM33xx SoCs ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt | 84 ++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c | 9 +- arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 4 +- include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h | 2 + 5 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt -- 1.7.11.7 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 1/3] mtd: omap-nand: pass device_node in platform data 2012-11-19 15:29 [PATCH v4 0/3] OMAP GPMC DT bindings Daniel Mack @ 2012-11-19 15:29 ` Daniel Mack 2012-11-19 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: enable hwecc for AM33xx SoCs Daniel Mack ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Daniel Mack @ 2012-11-19 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Pass an optional device_node pointer in the platform data, which in turn will be put into a mtd_part_parser_data. This way, code that sets up the platform devices can pass along the node from DT so that the partitions can be parsed. For non-DT boards, this change has no effect. Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com> --- drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 4 +++- include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c index 5c8978e..1e1d6ef 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c @@ -1333,6 +1333,7 @@ static int __devinit omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) dma_cap_mask_t mask; unsigned sig; struct resource *res; + struct mtd_part_parser_data ppdata = {}; pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data; if (pdata == NULL) { @@ -1558,7 +1559,8 @@ static int __devinit omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto out_release_mem_region; } - mtd_device_parse_register(&info->mtd, NULL, NULL, pdata->parts, + ppdata.of_node = pdata->of_node; + mtd_device_parse_register(&info->mtd, NULL, &ppdata, pdata->parts, pdata->nr_parts); platform_set_drvdata(pdev, &info->mtd); diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h b/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h index 24d32ca..5217d6e 100644 --- a/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ struct omap_nand_platform_data { int devsize; enum omap_ecc ecc_opt; struct gpmc_nand_regs reg; + /* for passing the partitions */ + struct device_node *of_node; }; #endif -- 1.7.11.7 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: enable hwecc for AM33xx SoCs 2012-11-19 15:29 [PATCH v4 0/3] OMAP GPMC DT bindings Daniel Mack 2012-11-19 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mtd: omap-nand: pass device_node in platform data Daniel Mack @ 2012-11-19 15:29 ` Daniel Mack 2012-11-19 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND Daniel Mack 2012-11-19 16:48 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] OMAP GPMC DT bindings Jon Hunter 3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Daniel Mack @ 2012-11-19 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c index 8607735..e23d561 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c @@ -92,17 +92,18 @@ static int omap2_nand_gpmc_retime( static bool __init gpmc_hwecc_bch_capable(enum omap_ecc ecc_opt) { /* support only OMAP3 class */ - if (!cpu_is_omap34xx()) { + if (!cpu_is_omap34xx() && !soc_is_am33xx()) { pr_err("BCH ecc is not supported on this CPU\n"); return 0; } /* - * For now, assume 4-bit mode is only supported on OMAP3630 ES1.x, x>=1. - * Other chips may be added if confirmed to work. + * For now, assume 4-bit mode is only supported on OMAP3630 ES1.x, x>=1 + * and AM33xx derivates. Other chips may be added if confirmed to work. */ if ((ecc_opt == OMAP_ECC_BCH4_CODE_HW) && - (!cpu_is_omap3630() || (GET_OMAP_REVISION() == 0))) { + (!cpu_is_omap3630() || (GET_OMAP_REVISION() == 0)) && + (!soc_is_am33xx())) { pr_err("BCH 4-bit mode is not supported on this CPU\n"); return 0; } -- 1.7.11.7 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND 2012-11-19 15:29 [PATCH v4 0/3] OMAP GPMC DT bindings Daniel Mack 2012-11-19 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mtd: omap-nand: pass device_node in platform data Daniel Mack 2012-11-19 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: enable hwecc for AM33xx SoCs Daniel Mack @ 2012-11-19 15:29 ` Daniel Mack 2012-11-19 20:52 ` Peter Korsgaard 2012-11-20 11:26 ` Philip, Avinash 2012-11-19 16:48 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] OMAP GPMC DT bindings Jon Hunter 3 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Daniel Mack @ 2012-11-19 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel This patch adds basic DT bindings for OMAP GPMC. The actual peripherals are instanciated from child nodes within the GPMC node, and the only type of device that is currently supported is NAND. Code was added to parse the generic GPMC timing parameters and some documentation with examples on how to use them. Successfully tested on an AM33xx board. Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com> --- .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt | 84 ++++++++++ arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 254 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..20aa5b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +Device tree bindings for GPMC connected NANDs + +GPMC connected NAND (found on OMAP boards) are represented as child nodes of +the GPMC controller with a name of "nand". + +All timing relevant properties as well as generic gpmc child properties are +explained in a separate documents - please refer to +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/ti-gpmc.txt + +For NAND specific properties such as ECC modes or bus width, please refer to +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt + + +Required properties: + + - reg: The CS line the peripheral is connected to + +Optional properties: + + - nand-bus-width: Set this numeric value to 16 if the hardware + is wired that way. If not specified, a bus + width of 8 is assumed. + - ti,nand-ecc-opt: A string setting the ECC layout to use. One of: + + Layouts for 1-bit ecc: stored at end of spare area: + + "software" Software method (default) + "hw" Hardware method (let gpmc do the error detection) + + Layouts for 1-bit ecc: stored at beginning of spare area as romcode: + + "hw-romcode" gpmc method & romcode layout + "bch4" 4-bit BCH ecc code + "bch8" 8-bit BCH ecc code + + - ti,nand-ecc-use-elm: Property without value to specify that the + hardware error correction mode should be used. + +For inline partiton table parsing (optional): + + - #address-cells: should be set to 1 + - #size-cells: should be set to 1 + +Example for an AM33xx board: + + gpmc: gpmc at 50000000 { + compatible = "ti,gpmc"; + ti,hwmods = "gpmc"; + reg = <0x50000000 0x1000000>; + interrupts = <100>; + num-cs = <8>; + num-waitpins = <8>; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <1>; + ranges = <0 0 0x08000000 0x10000000>; /* CS0: NAND */ + + nand at 0,0 { + reg = <0 0 0>; /* CS0, offset 0 */ + nand-bus-width = <16>; + ti,nand-ecc-opt = "none"; + ti,nand-ecc-use-elm; + + gpmc,sync-clk = <0>; + gpmc,cs-on = <0>; + gpmc,cs-rd-off = <44>; + gpmc,cs-wr-off = <44>; + gpmc,adv-on = <6>; + gpmc,adv-rd-off = <34>; + gpmc,adv-wr-off = <44>; + gpmc,we-off = <40>; + gpmc,oe-off = <54>; + gpmc,access = <64>; + gpmc,rd-cycle = <82>; + gpmc,wr-cycle = <82>; + gpmc,wr-access = <40>; + gpmc,wr-data-mux-bus = <0>; + + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + + /* partitions go here */ + }; + }; + diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c index 7660a56..971a2bf 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_mtd.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> +#include <linux/mtd/nand.h> #include <linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h> @@ -34,6 +38,7 @@ #include "common.h" #include "omap_device.h" #include "gpmc.h" +#include "gpmc-nand.h" #define DEVICE_NAME "omap-gpmc" @@ -748,6 +753,162 @@ static int __devinit gpmc_mem_init(void) return 0; } +#ifdef CONFIG_OF +static struct of_device_id gpmc_dt_ids[] = { + { .compatible = "ti,gpmc" }, + { } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, gpmc_dt_ids); + +static void __maybe_unused gpmc_read_timings_dt(struct device_node *np, + struct gpmc_timings *gpmc_t) +{ + u32 val; + + memset(gpmc_t, 0, sizeof(*gpmc_t)); + + /* minimum clock period for syncronous mode */ + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,sync-clk", &val)) + gpmc_t->sync_clk = val; + + /* chip select timtings */ + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,cs-on", &val)) + gpmc_t->cs_on = val; + + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,cs-rd-off", &val)) + gpmc_t->cs_rd_off = val; + + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,cs-wr-off", &val)) + gpmc_t->cs_wr_off = val; + + /* ADV signal timings */ + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,adv-on", &val)) + gpmc_t->adv_on = val; + + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,adv-rd-off", &val)) + gpmc_t->adv_rd_off = val; + + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,adv-wr-off", &val)) + gpmc_t->adv_wr_off = val; + + /* WE signal timings */ + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,we-on", &val)) + gpmc_t->we_on = val; + + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,we-off", &val)) + gpmc_t->we_off = val; + + /* OE signal timings */ + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,oe-on", &val)) + gpmc_t->oe_on = val; + + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,oe-off", &val)) + gpmc_t->oe_off = val; + + /* access and cycle timings */ + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,page-burst-access", &val)) + gpmc_t->page_burst_access = val; + + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,access", &val)) + gpmc_t->access = val; + + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,rd-cycle", &val)) + gpmc_t->rd_cycle = val; + + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,wr-cycle", &val)) + gpmc_t->wr_cycle = val; + + /* only for OMAP3430 */ + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,wr-access", &val)) + gpmc_t->wr_access = val; + + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,wr-data-mux-bus", &val)) + gpmc_t->wr_data_mux_bus = val; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_NAND + +static const char *nand_ecc_opts[] = { + [OMAP_ECC_HAMMING_CODE_DEFAULT] = "software", + [OMAP_ECC_HAMMING_CODE_HW] = "hw", + [OMAP_ECC_HAMMING_CODE_HW_ROMCODE] = "hw-romcode", + [OMAP_ECC_BCH4_CODE_HW] = "bch4", + [OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW] = "bch8", +}; + +static int __devinit gpmc_probe_nand_child(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct device_node *child) +{ + u32 val; + const char *s; + struct gpmc_timings gpmc_t; + struct omap_nand_platform_data *gpmc_nand_data; + + if (of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &val) < 0) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s has no 'reg' property\n", + child->full_name); + return -ENODEV; + } + + gpmc_nand_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*gpmc_nand_data), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!gpmc_nand_data) + return -ENOMEM; + + gpmc_nand_data->cs = val; + gpmc_nand_data->of_node = child; + + if (!of_property_read_string(child, "ti,nand-ecc-opt", &s)) + for (val = 0; val < ARRAY_SIZE(nand_ecc_opts); val++) + if (!strcasecmp(s, nand_ecc_opts[val])) + gpmc_nand_data->ecc_opt = val; + + if (of_get_property(child, "ti,nand-ecc-use-elm", NULL)) + gpmc_nand_data->is_elm_used = 1; + + val = of_get_nand_bus_width(child); + if (val == 16) + gpmc_nand_data->devsize = NAND_BUSWIDTH_16; + + gpmc_read_timings_dt(child, &gpmc_t); + gpmc_nand_init(gpmc_nand_data, &gpmc_t); + + return 0; +} +#else +static int __devinit gpmc_probe_nand_child(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct device_node *child) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif + +static int __devinit gpmc_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + int ret; + struct device_node *child; + const struct of_device_id *of_id = + of_match_device(gpmc_dt_ids, &pdev->dev); + + if (!of_id) + return 0; + + for_each_node_by_name(child, "nand") { + ret = gpmc_probe_nand_child(pdev, child); + of_node_put(child); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + } + + return 0; +} +#else +static int __devinit gpmc_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + return 0; +} +#endif + static __devinit int gpmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { int rc; @@ -801,6 +962,14 @@ static __devinit int gpmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (IS_ERR_VALUE(gpmc_setup_irq())) dev_warn(gpmc_dev, "gpmc_setup_irq failed\n"); + rc = gpmc_probe_dt(pdev); + if (rc < 0) { + clk_disable_unprepare(gpmc_l3_clk); + clk_put(gpmc_l3_clk); + dev_err(gpmc_dev, "failed to probe DT parameters\n"); + return rc; + } + return 0; } @@ -818,6 +987,7 @@ static struct platform_driver gpmc_driver = { .driver = { .name = DEVICE_NAME, .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(gpmc_dt_ids), }, }; -- 1.7.11.7 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND 2012-11-19 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND Daniel Mack @ 2012-11-19 20:52 ` Peter Korsgaard 2012-11-23 10:36 ` Daniel Mack 2012-11-20 11:26 ` Philip, Avinash 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2012-11-19 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel >>>>> "D" == Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com> writes: Hi, D> This patch adds basic DT bindings for OMAP GPMC. D> The actual peripherals are instanciated from child nodes within the GPMC s/instanciated/instantiated/ D> node, and the only type of device that is currently supported is NAND. D> Code was added to parse the generic GPMC timing parameters and some D> documentation with examples on how to use them. D> Successfully tested on an AM33xx board. D> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com> D> --- D> .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt | 84 ++++++++++ D> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++ D> 2 files changed, 254 insertions(+) D> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt D> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt D> new file mode 100644 D> index 0000000..20aa5b9 D> --- /dev/null D> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt D> @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ D> +Device tree bindings for GPMC connected NANDs D> + D> +GPMC connected NAND (found on OMAP boards) are represented as child nodes of D> +the GPMC controller with a name of "nand". D> + D> +All timing relevant properties as well as generic gpmc child properties are D> +explained in a separate documents - please refer to D> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/ti-gpmc.txt Which this patch seems to be missing? D> + D> +For NAND specific properties such as ECC modes or bus width, please refer to D> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt D> + D> + D> +Required properties: D> + D> + - reg: The CS line the peripheral is connected to D> + D> +Optional properties: D> + D> + - nand-bus-width: Set this numeric value to 16 if the hardware D> + is wired that way. If not specified, a bus D> + width of 8 is assumed. D> + - ti,nand-ecc-opt: A string setting the ECC layout to use. One of: D> + D> + Layouts for 1-bit ecc: stored at end of spare area: D> + D> + "software" Software method (default) D> + "hw" Hardware method (let gpmc do the error detection) Nit: why are you spelling out 'software' when everything else is shortened? D> + D> + Layouts for 1-bit ecc: stored at beginning of spare area as romcode: D> + D> + "hw-romcode" gpmc method & romcode layout D> + "bch4" 4-bit BCH ecc code D> + "bch8" 8-bit BCH ecc code D> + These are not 1-bit - Well, romcode might be depending on SoC. Looking at omap2.c it seems to be an alias for hw, so that isn't really helpful on E.G. am33xx where you should select bch8 to have something compatible with the romcode. D> + - ti,nand-ecc-use-elm: Property without value to specify that the D> + hardware error correction mode should be used. It's called the error location module. Like you pointed out yourself, this property isn't really nice. I haven't looked at the elm bindings in detail, but couldn't the nand driver automatically use the elm if the device tree provides a node for it? Perhaps the elm should be a subnode of the nand one? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND 2012-11-19 20:52 ` Peter Korsgaard @ 2012-11-23 10:36 ` Daniel Mack 2012-11-23 10:47 ` Peter Korsgaard 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Daniel Mack @ 2012-11-23 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Hi Peter, On 19.11.2012 21:52, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >>>>>> "D" == Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com> writes: > > Hi, > > D> This patch adds basic DT bindings for OMAP GPMC. > D> The actual peripherals are instanciated from child nodes within the GPMC > > s/instanciated/instantiated/ Thanks, fixed. > > D> node, and the only type of device that is currently supported is NAND. > > D> Code was added to parse the generic GPMC timing parameters and some > D> documentation with examples on how to use them. > > D> Successfully tested on an AM33xx board. > > D> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com> > D> --- > D> .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt | 84 ++++++++++ > D> arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++ > D> 2 files changed, 254 insertions(+) > D> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt > > D> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt > D> new file mode 100644 > D> index 0000000..20aa5b9 > D> --- /dev/null > D> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt > D> @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ > D> +Device tree bindings for GPMC connected NANDs > D> + > D> +GPMC connected NAND (found on OMAP boards) are represented as child nodes of > D> +the GPMC controller with a name of "nand". > D> + > D> +All timing relevant properties as well as generic gpmc child properties are > D> +explained in a separate documents - please refer to > D> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/ti-gpmc.txt > > Which this patch seems to be missing? True - sorry for that. Will be back at v5. > D> + > D> +For NAND specific properties such as ECC modes or bus width, please refer to > D> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt > D> + > D> + > D> +Required properties: > D> + > D> + - reg: The CS line the peripheral is connected to > D> + > D> +Optional properties: > D> + > D> + - nand-bus-width: Set this numeric value to 16 if the hardware > D> + is wired that way. If not specified, a bus > D> + width of 8 is assumed. > D> + - ti,nand-ecc-opt: A string setting the ECC layout to use. One of: > D> + > D> + Layouts for 1-bit ecc: stored at end of spare area: > D> + > D> + "software" Software method (default) > D> + "hw" Hardware method (let gpmc do the error detection) > > Nit: why are you spelling out 'software' when everything else is shortened? Right. Fixed. > > D> + > D> + Layouts for 1-bit ecc: stored at beginning of spare area as romcode: > D> + > D> + "hw-romcode" gpmc method & romcode layout > D> + "bch4" 4-bit BCH ecc code > D> + "bch8" 8-bit BCH ecc code > D> + > > These are not 1-bit - Well, romcode might be depending on SoC. Looking at > omap2.c it seems to be an alias for hw, so that isn't really helpful on > E.G. am33xx where you should select bch8 to have something compatible > with the romcode. Not sure whether I follow you here. drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c handles cases for pdata->ecc_opt == OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW, so the DT bindings need to offer a way to set it. Or are you purely referring to the comments only? > D> + - ti,nand-ecc-use-elm: Property without value to specify that the > D> + hardware error correction mode should be used. > > It's called the error location module. Like you pointed out yourself, > this property isn't really nice. I haven't looked at the elm bindings in > detail, but couldn't the nand driver automatically use the elm if the > device tree provides a node for it? Perhaps the elm should be a subnode > of the nand one? That is to be discussed for the elm driver then. I'm not sure though whether the elm should always be used when its DT node is present. For now, I would leave it the way it is and have an optional "ti,nand-ecc-use-elm". I just added some more lines of documenation to describe the fact that the elm driver is needed in order to make it work. Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND 2012-11-23 10:36 ` Daniel Mack @ 2012-11-23 10:47 ` Peter Korsgaard 2012-11-23 10:55 ` Daniel Mack 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2012-11-23 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com> writes: Hi, D> + Layouts for 1-bit ecc: stored at beginning of spare area as romcode: D> + D> + "hw-romcode" gpmc method & romcode layout D> + "bch4" 4-bit BCH ecc code D> + "bch8" 8-bit BCH ecc code D> + >> >> These are not 1-bit - Well, romcode might be depending on SoC. Looking at >> omap2.c it seems to be an alias for hw, so that isn't really helpful on >> E.G. am33xx where you should select bch8 to have something compatible >> with the romcode. Daniel> Not sure whether I follow you here. drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c handles Daniel> cases for pdata->ecc_opt == OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW, so the DT bindings Daniel> need to offer a way to set it. Daniel> Or are you purely referring to the comments only? Yes, but the document states (the first line I'm quotinge) 'Layouts for 1-bit ecc'. The other comment was about hw-romcode not being a very good name, as it apparently means the 1bit hamming code and ECC layout used on the older omap3, and not E.G. the bch8/elm layout used by E.G. am335x. D> + - ti,nand-ecc-use-elm: Property without value to specify that the D> + hardware error correction mode should be used. >> >> It's called the error location module. Like you pointed out yourself, >> this property isn't really nice. I haven't looked at the elm bindings in >> detail, but couldn't the nand driver automatically use the elm if the >> device tree provides a node for it? Perhaps the elm should be a subnode >> of the nand one? Daniel> That is to be discussed for the elm driver then. I'm not sure though Daniel> whether the elm should always be used when its DT node is present. Daniel> For now, I would leave it the way it is and have an optional Daniel> "ti,nand-ecc-use-elm". I just added some more lines of documenation to Daniel> describe the fact that the elm driver is needed in order to make it work. As discussed elsewhere, the elm also changes the ECC layout, so why not just have bchN (software bchN layout) / bchN-elm selections instead of the seperate ti,nand-ecc-use-elm? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND 2012-11-23 10:47 ` Peter Korsgaard @ 2012-11-23 10:55 ` Daniel Mack 2012-11-23 11:06 ` Peter Korsgaard 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Daniel Mack @ 2012-11-23 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 23.11.2012 11:47, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com> writes: > > Hi, > > D> + Layouts for 1-bit ecc: stored at beginning of spare area as romcode: > D> + > D> + "hw-romcode" gpmc method & romcode layout > D> + "bch4" 4-bit BCH ecc code > D> + "bch8" 8-bit BCH ecc code > D> + > >> > >> These are not 1-bit - Well, romcode might be depending on SoC. Looking at > >> omap2.c it seems to be an alias for hw, so that isn't really helpful on > >> E.G. am33xx where you should select bch8 to have something compatible > >> with the romcode. > > Daniel> Not sure whether I follow you here. drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c handles > Daniel> cases for pdata->ecc_opt == OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW, so the DT bindings > Daniel> need to offer a way to set it. > > Daniel> Or are you purely referring to the comments only? > > Yes, but the document states (the first line I'm quotinge) 'Layouts for > 1-bit ecc'. Ok, I guess I'll just remove these comments then. > The other comment was about hw-romcode not being a very good > name, as it apparently means the 1bit hamming code and ECC layout used > on the older omap3, and not E.G. the bch8/elm layout used by > E.G. am335x. So which name would you pick? "bch1"? > As discussed elsewhere, the elm also changes the ECC layout, so why not > just have bchN (software bchN layout) / bchN-elm selections instead of > the seperate ti,nand-ecc-use-elm? Avinash - what do you think? Thanks for the feedback - I'd also like to get these bindings right in the first place. Daniel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND 2012-11-23 10:55 ` Daniel Mack @ 2012-11-23 11:06 ` Peter Korsgaard 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2012-11-23 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com> writes: Hi, >> The other comment was about hw-romcode not being a very good >> name, as it apparently means the 1bit hamming code and ECC layout used >> on the older omap3, and not E.G. the bch8/elm layout used by >> E.G. am335x. Daniel> So which name would you pick? "bch1"? No, it's hamming code, isn't it? To me it seems similar to the elm discussion, E.G. we have a mix of ECC algorithm + ECC layout + use of hw acceleration or not. The choice of hardware acceleration or not should preferably be transparent to this binding (E.G. it is purely an optimization, ECC strength/format shouldn't change), so the driver should be free to use it if it is available. Daniel> Thanks for the feedback - I'd also like to get these bindings Daniel> right in the first place. Me too! -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND 2012-11-19 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND Daniel Mack 2012-11-19 20:52 ` Peter Korsgaard @ 2012-11-20 11:26 ` Philip, Avinash 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Philip, Avinash @ 2012-11-20 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 20:59:16, Daniel Mack wrote: > This patch adds basic DT bindings for OMAP GPMC. > ... > + > + if (of_get_property(child, "ti,nand-ecc-use-elm", NULL)) > + gpmc_nand_data->is_elm_used = 1; Can you set to bool value (true) here. Thanks Avinash ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 0/3] OMAP GPMC DT bindings 2012-11-19 15:29 [PATCH v4 0/3] OMAP GPMC DT bindings Daniel Mack ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2012-11-19 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND Daniel Mack @ 2012-11-19 16:48 ` Jon Hunter 3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Jon Hunter @ 2012-11-19 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 11/19/2012 09:29 AM, Daniel Mack wrote: > This is a series of patches to support GPMC peripherals on OMAP boards. > > Depends on Linus' master + > omap-next (branch omap-for-v3.8/cleanup-headers-gpmc) > > The only supported peripheral for now is NAND, but other types would be > easy to add. > > Version 2 addresses details pointed out by Jon Hunter, Afzal Mohammed > and Rob Herring: > > - add "reg" and "ti,hwmod" properties to Documentation > - use generic of_mtd functions and the property names defined by them, > namely "nand-bus-width" and "nand-ecc-mode" > - reduce the default register space size in the Documentation to 8K, > as found in the hwmod code > - switch to a DT layout based on ranges and address translation. > Although this property is not currently looked at as long as the > handling code still uses the runtime calculation methods, we now > have these values in the bindings, eventually allowing us to > switch the implementation with less pain. > > Version 3 includes fixes pointed out by Jon Hunter: > > - better documentation of the 'ranges' property to describe the > fact that it's representing the CS lines > - GPMC_CS_CONFIGx -> GPMC_CONFIGx in comments > - drop interrupt-parent from example bindings > - add of_node_put() at the end of the child iteration > > Version 4 fixes compilation for !CONFIG_MTD_NAND and includes more > details from Jon Hunter and Avinash, Philip: > > - Add "num-cs" and "num-waitpins" properties, which will eventually > be used to get rid of GPMC_CS_NUM > - Better description of generic nand DT properties > - Dropped patch 3/4 as an equivalent fix was already merged > - Added ti,nand-ecc-use-elm property > > Daniel Mack (3): > mtd: omap-nand: pass device_node in platform data > ARM: OMAP: gpmc: enable hwecc for AM33xx SoCs > ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND > > .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt | 84 ++++++++++ > arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-nand.c | 9 +- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 4 +- > include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h | 2 + > 5 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt Thanks for sending out the update. Am I missing something or did you drop the gpmc.txt binding documentation? Cheers Jon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-23 11:06 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-11-19 15:29 [PATCH v4 0/3] OMAP GPMC DT bindings Daniel Mack 2012-11-19 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mtd: omap-nand: pass device_node in platform data Daniel Mack 2012-11-19 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: enable hwecc for AM33xx SoCs Daniel Mack 2012-11-19 15:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: OMAP: gpmc: add DT bindings for GPMC timings and NAND Daniel Mack 2012-11-19 20:52 ` Peter Korsgaard 2012-11-23 10:36 ` Daniel Mack 2012-11-23 10:47 ` Peter Korsgaard 2012-11-23 10:55 ` Daniel Mack 2012-11-23 11:06 ` Peter Korsgaard 2012-11-20 11:26 ` Philip, Avinash 2012-11-19 16:48 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] OMAP GPMC DT bindings Jon Hunter
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).