From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:55:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 03/12] regulator: gpio-regulator: Fix logical error in for() loop In-Reply-To: <1355129761-8088-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> References: <1355129761-8088-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Message-ID: <1355129761-8088-4-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org The cond-statement of this particular for() loop will always be true as long as at least one voltage-shifting GPIO is present. If it wasn't for the break below, we'd be stuck in a forever loop. This patch inserts the correct cond-statement into the statement. Cc: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c index 3afa46a..5462c28 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/gpio-regulator.c @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ of_get_gpio_regulator_config(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np) if (!config->gpios) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); - for (i = 0; config->nr_gpios; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < config->nr_gpios; i++) { gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "gpios", i); if (gpio < 0) break; -- 1.7.9.5