From: t-kristo@ti.com (Tero Kristo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] ARM: OMAP3xxx: PM: convert to use the functional power states API
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:45:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357307118.2221.93.camel@sokoban> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121209175312.6933.92995.stgit@dusk.lan>
Hi Paul,
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 10:53 -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
<clip>
> @@ -112,24 +112,26 @@ static void omap3_core_restore_context(void)
> static void omap3_save_secure_ram_context(void)
> {
> u32 ret;
> - int mpu_next_state = pwrdm_read_next_pwrst(mpu_pwrdm);
> + int mpu_next_fpwrst;
>
> - if (omap_type() != OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP) {
> - /*
> - * MPU next state must be set to POWER_ON temporarily,
> - * otherwise the WFI executed inside the ROM code
> - * will hang the system.
> - */
> - pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(mpu_pwrdm, PWRDM_POWER_ON);
> - ret = _omap_save_secure_sram((u32 *)
> - __pa(omap3_secure_ram_storage));
> - pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(mpu_pwrdm, mpu_next_state);
> - /* Following is for error tracking, it should not happen */
> - if (ret) {
> - pr_err("save_secure_sram() returns %08x\n", ret);
> - while (1)
> - ;
> - }
> + if (omap_type() == OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP)
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * MPU next state must be set to POWER_ON temporarily,
> + * otherwise the WFI executed inside the ROM code will hang
> + * the system.
> + */
> + mpu_next_fpwrst = pwrdm_read_next_fpwrst(mpu_pwrdm);
> + pwrdm_set_next_fpwrst(mpu_pwrdm, PWRDM_FUNC_PWRST_ON);
> + ret = _omap_save_secure_sram((u32 *)__pa(omap3_secure_ram_storage));
> + pwrdm_set_next_fpwrst(mpu_pwrdm, mpu_next_fpwrst);
> + /* Following is for error tracking, it should not happen */
> + /* XXX This needs to be converted to a BUG() or removed */
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("save_secure_sram() returns %08x\n", ret);
> + while (1)
> + ;
Just a minor comment here, this can be converted to BUG_ON right now, as
it is only used from init code.
Another thing to consider with this code is, that there might be someone
who actually wants to use secure services from the kernel, and in this
case you need to do the save every time you are entering off-mode if
secure services have been used. If this save fails, the core powerdomain
should be re-programmed to RET, or prevent idle completely. Maybe this
needs to be moved into secure driver or something, and use cpu_pm
notifiers.... they don't support failures currently though.
-Tero
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-04 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-09 17:52 [PATCH 00/12] ARM: OMAP2+: powerdomain/PM: convert to functional power states Paul Walmsley
2012-12-09 17:52 ` [PATCH 01/12] ARM: OMAP2+: powerdomain: add functions that report on powerdomain capabilities Paul Walmsley
2012-12-09 17:53 ` [PATCH 02/12] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: introduce power domains functional states Paul Walmsley
2012-12-12 10:00 ` Jean Pihet
2013-01-29 21:20 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-12-12 10:21 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2012-12-12 10:33 ` Jean Pihet
2013-01-04 13:22 ` Tero Kristo
2012-12-26 6:06 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2012-12-09 17:53 ` [PATCH 03/12] ARM: OMAP2+: PM debug: trace the functional power domains states Paul Walmsley
2012-12-09 17:53 ` [PATCH 04/12] ARM: OMAP2xxx: PM: convert to use the functional power states API Paul Walmsley
2012-12-09 17:53 ` [PATCH 05/12] ARM: OMAP3xxx: " Paul Walmsley
2012-12-12 10:18 ` Jean Pihet
2012-12-12 10:29 ` Jean Pihet
2013-01-04 13:45 ` Tero Kristo [this message]
2012-12-09 17:53 ` [PATCH 06/12] ARM: OMAP44xx: " Paul Walmsley
2012-12-12 10:41 ` Jean Pihet
2013-01-04 14:01 ` Tero Kristo
2012-12-09 17:53 ` [PATCH 07/12] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: use power domain functional state in stats counters Paul Walmsley
2012-12-12 10:46 ` Jean Pihet
2013-01-04 14:07 ` Tero Kristo
2012-12-09 17:53 ` [PATCH 08/12] ARM: OMAP2+: powerdomain: drop many low-level powerdomain funcs Paul Walmsley
2012-12-09 17:53 ` [PATCH 09/12] ARM: OMAP2+: powerdomain: add ability to test for supported power states Paul Walmsley
2012-12-09 17:53 ` [PATCH 10/12] ARM: OMAP2+: powerdomain/PM: only program " Paul Walmsley
2012-12-09 17:53 ` [PATCH 11/12] ARM: OMAP2+: powerdomain: program memory bank next-power-state upon init Paul Walmsley
2012-12-09 17:53 ` [PATCH 12/12] ARM: OMAP2+: powerdomain: assume memory bank power states follow powerdomain Paul Walmsley
2013-01-04 14:12 ` [PATCH 00/12] ARM: OMAP2+: powerdomain/PM: convert to functional power states Tero Kristo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1357307118.2221.93.camel@sokoban \
--to=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).