From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@prisktech.co.nz (Tony Prisk) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:09:30 +1300 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850 In-Reply-To: References: <1356650452-16559-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> <1356650452-16559-2-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> <1357712039.774.0.camel@gitbox> Message-ID: <1357758570.27076.8.camel@gitbox> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 22:30 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Tony Prisk wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:20 +1300, Tony Prisk wrote: > >> This patch adds support for the WM8750 (ARMv6) and WM8850 (ARMv7). > >> > >> Common features across all SoCs are split into ARCH_VT8500 and > >> unique features are specified by each SoC option. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk > > > > > > Hi Arnd, Olof, > > > > Haven't heard anything re: this patch series. Problem? > > Nope, just wasn't sure if you would send a git pull request or if you > wanted them applied. > > I'm out of time for tonight, but I'll look closer at them (and apply > them if all OK) tomorrow. > > > -Olof I'm quite happy to send a pull request if that's what you prefer. Generally people have just taken the patches straight from email, so everytime I've done a pull-request I get a reply back saying the patches have already been applied. Is there some 'rule' around pull-requests vs emailed patches? Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already? Regards Tony P