From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@prisktech.co.nz (Tony Prisk)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:03:27 +1300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
In-Reply-To: <201301092127.05804.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <1356650452-16559-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz>
 <CAOesGMj6XTuW9tPqYnawPvO-wJBd7s5M5xTfdvQcmEioHw=Pnw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1357758570.27076.8.camel@gitbox> <201301092127.05804.arnd@arndb.de>
Message-ID: <1357783407.28830.2.camel@gitbox>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 21:27 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 January 2013, Tony Prisk wrote:
> > I'm quite happy to send a pull request if that's what you prefer.
> > 
> > Generally people have just taken the patches straight from email, so
> > everytime I've done a pull-request I get a reply back saying the patches
> > have already been applied.
> > 
> > Is there some 'rule' around pull-requests vs emailed patches?
> 
> Generally, pull requests tend to be less work for us, so I prefer
> them. In particular, when you add a tag description or a signed
> tag, that gives automatically puts  nice text into the merge
> changeset.
> 
> > Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> 	Arnd

This is what I thought - and the reason I haven't sent a pull-request
for the patch's - I haven't had any Ack's :)

Regards
Tony P