From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@prisktech.co.nz (Tony Prisk)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:45:27 +1300
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: vt8500: memory cleanup missing
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkda+1MqPp-KBe5w+pTeHChE0Daa+U97dO+d1Px_Ssi_vHg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1357163240-23131-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz>
 <20130110105710.GA19944@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <CACRpkda+1MqPp-KBe5w+pTeHChE0Daa+U97dO+d1Px_Ssi_vHg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1357843527.6075.9.camel@gitbox>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 13:02 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 10:47:20AM +1300, Tony Prisk wrote:
> 
> >> +static int vt8500_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> +{
> >> +     int i;
> >> +     int ret;
> >> +     const struct vt8500_gpio_data *data;
> >> +     void __iomem *gpio_base = vtchip[0].base;
> >> +     const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> >> +                             of_match_device(vt8500_gpio_dt_ids, &pdev->dev);
> >> +
> >
> > You can get at the vtchip pointer if you put it into the platform device's
> > driver data pointer.  That way, you're not artificially limiting this
> > driver to just one device, and, with your changes it will go wrong if DT
> > ever lists more than one device.
> 
> Good point, I'm sloppy today :-(
> 
> Patch dropped.
> 
> Tony pls proceed as indicated by Russell.
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

I must have been having a 'stupid' day to not realise that. Will fix.
Thanks Russell.

Regards
Tony P