linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: josephl@nvidia.com (Joseph Lo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/16] big.LITTLE low-level CPU and cluster power management
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:56:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358157392.19304.243.camel@jlo-ubuntu-64.nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357777251-13541-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>

Hi Nicolas,

On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 08:20 +0800, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> This is the initial public posting of the initial support for big.LITTLE.
> Included here is the code required to safely power up and down CPUs in a
> b.L system, whether this is via CPU hotplug, a cpuidle driver or the
> Linaro b.L in-kernel switcher[*] on top of this.  Only  SMP secondary
> boot and CPU hotplug support is included at this time.  Getting to this
> point already represents a significcant chunk of code as illustrated by
> the diffstat below.
> 
> This work was presented at Linaro Connect in Copenhagen by Dave Martin and
> myself.  The presentation slides are available here:
> 
> http://www.linaro.org/documents/download/f3569407bb1fb8bde0d6da80e285b832508f92f57223c
> 
> The code is now stable on both Fast Models as well as Virtual Express TC2
> and ready for public review.
> 
> Platform support is included for Fast Models implementing the
> Cortex-A15x4-A7x4 and Cortex-A15x1-A7x1 configurations.  To allow
> successful compilation, I also included a preliminary version of the
> CCI400 driver from Lorenzo Pieralisi.
> 
> Support for actual hardware such as Vexpress TC2 should come later,
> once the basic infrastructure from this series is merged.  A few DT
> bindings are used but not yet documented.
> 
> This series is made of the following parts:
> 
> Low-level support code:
> [PATCH 01/16] ARM: b.L: secondary kernel entry code
> [PATCH 02/16] ARM: b.L: introduce the CPU/cluster power API
> [PATCH 03/16] ARM: b.L: introduce helpers for platform coherency
> [PATCH 04/16] ARM: b.L: Add baremetal voting mutexes
> [PATCH 05/16] ARM: bL_head: vlock-based first man election
> 
> Adaptation layer to hook with the generic kernel infrastructure:
> [PATCH 06/16] ARM: b.L: generic SMP secondary bringup and hotplug
> [PATCH 07/16] ARM: bL_platsmp.c: close the kernel entry gate before
> [PATCH 08/16] ARM: bL_platsmp.c: make sure the GIC interface of a
> [PATCH 09/16] ARM: vexpress: Select the correct SMP operations at
> 
> Fast Models support:
> [PATCH 10/16] ARM: vexpress: introduce DCSCB support
> [PATCH 11/16] ARM: vexpress/dcscb: add CPU use counts to the power
> [PATCH 12/16] ARM: vexpress/dcscb: do not hardcode number of CPUs
> [PATCH 13/16] drivers: misc: add ARM CCI support
> [PATCH 14/16] ARM: TC2: ensure powerdown-time data is flushed from
> [PATCH 15/16] ARM: vexpress/dcscb: handle platform coherency
> [PATCH 16/16] ARM: vexpress/dcscb: probe via device tree
> 

Thanks for introducing this series.
I am taking a look at this series. It introduced an algorithm for
syncing and avoid racing when syncing the power status of clusters and
CPUs. Do you think these codes could have a chance to become a generic
framework?

The Tegra chip series had a similar design for CPU clusters and it had
limitation that the CPU0 always needs to be the last CPU to be shut down
before cluster power down as well. I believe it can also get benefits of
this works. We indeed need a similar algorithm to sync CPUs power status
before cluster power down and switching.

The "bL_entry.c", "bL_entry.S", "bL_entry.h", "vlock.h" and "vlock.S"
looks have a chance to be a common framework for ARM platform even if it
just support one cluster. Because some systems had the limitations for
cluster power down. That's why the coupled cpuidle been introduced. And
this framework could be enabled automatically if platform dependent or
by menuconfig.

For ex,
	select CPUS_CLUSTERS_POWER_SYNC_FRAMEWORK if SMP && CPU_PM

How do you think of this suggestion?

BTW, some questions...
1. The "bL_entry_point" looks like a first run function when CPUs just
power up, then jumping to original reset vector that it should be
called. Do you think this should be a function and be called by reset
handler? Or in your design, this should be called as soon as possible
when the CPU power be resumed?

2. Does the Last_man mechanism should implement in platform specific
code to check something like cpu_online_status and if there is a
limitation for the specific last CPU to be powered down?

Thanks,
Joseph

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-14  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-10  0:20 [PATCH 00/16] big.LITTLE low-level CPU and cluster power management Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 01/16] ARM: b.L: secondary kernel entry code Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10  7:12   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-01-10 15:30     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10 15:34   ` Catalin Marinas
2013-01-10 16:47     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-11 11:45       ` Catalin Marinas
2013-01-11 12:05         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-01-11 12:19         ` Dave Martin
2013-01-10 23:05   ` Will Deacon
2013-01-11  1:26     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-11 10:55       ` Will Deacon
2013-01-11 11:35         ` Dave Martin
2013-01-11 17:16   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 18:10     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-11 18:30       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-07  7:37   ` Pavel Machek
2013-03-07  8:57     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 02/16] ARM: b.L: introduce the CPU/cluster power API Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10 23:08   ` Will Deacon
2013-01-11  2:30     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-11 10:58       ` Will Deacon
2013-01-11 11:29       ` Dave Martin
2013-01-11 17:26   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 18:33     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-11 18:41       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 19:54         ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 03/16] ARM: b.L: introduce helpers for platform coherency exit/setup Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10 12:01   ` Dave Martin
2013-01-10 19:04     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-11 11:30       ` Dave Martin
2013-01-10 16:53   ` Catalin Marinas
2013-01-10 17:59     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10 21:50       ` Catalin Marinas
2013-01-10 22:31         ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-11 10:36           ` Dave Martin
2013-01-10 22:32     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10 23:13   ` Will Deacon
2013-01-11  1:50     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-11 11:09       ` Dave Martin
2013-01-11 17:46   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 18:07     ` Dave Martin
2013-01-11 18:34       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-14 17:08   ` Dave Martin
2013-01-14 17:15     ` Catalin Marinas
2013-01-14 18:10       ` Dave Martin
2013-01-14 21:34         ` Catalin Marinas
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 04/16] ARM: b.L: Add baremetal voting mutexes Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10 23:18   ` Will Deacon
2013-01-11  3:15     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-11 11:03       ` Will Deacon
2013-01-11 16:57       ` Dave Martin
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 05/16] ARM: bL_head: vlock-based first man election Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 06/16] ARM: b.L: generic SMP secondary bringup and hotplug support Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-11 18:02   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-14 18:05     ` Achin Gupta
2013-01-15  6:32       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-15 11:18         ` Achin Gupta
2013-01-15 11:26           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-15 18:53           ` Dave Martin
2013-01-14 16:35   ` Will Deacon
2013-01-14 16:51     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-15 19:09       ` Dave Martin
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 07/16] ARM: bL_platsmp.c: close the kernel entry gate before hot-unplugging a CPU Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-14 16:37   ` Will Deacon
2013-01-14 16:53     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-14 17:00       ` Will Deacon
2013-01-14 17:11         ` Catalin Marinas
2013-01-14 17:15         ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-14 17:23           ` Will Deacon
2013-01-14 18:26           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-14 18:49             ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-15 18:40             ` Dave Martin
2013-01-16 16:06               ` Catalin Marinas
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 08/16] ARM: bL_platsmp.c: make sure the GIC interface of a dying CPU is disabled Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-11 18:07   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 19:07     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-12  6:50       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-12 16:47         ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-13  4:37           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-14 17:53           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-01-14 16:39   ` Will Deacon
2013-01-14 16:54     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-14 17:02       ` Will Deacon
2013-01-14 17:18         ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-14 17:24           ` Will Deacon
2013-01-14 17:56             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 09/16] ARM: vexpress: Select the correct SMP operations at run-time Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 10/16] ARM: vexpress: introduce DCSCB support Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-11 18:12   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 19:13     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-12  6:52       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 11/16] ARM: vexpress/dcscb: add CPU use counts to the power up/down API implementation Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 12/16] ARM: vexpress/dcscb: do not hardcode number of CPUs per cluster Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 13/16] drivers: misc: add ARM CCI support Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-11 18:20   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 19:22     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-12  6:53       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-15 18:34       ` Dave Martin
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 14/16] ARM: TC2: ensure powerdown-time data is flushed from cache Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10 18:50   ` Dave Martin
2013-01-10 19:13     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-11 11:38       ` Dave Martin
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 15/16] ARM: vexpress/dcscb: handle platform coherency exit/setup and CCI Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10 12:05   ` Dave Martin
2013-01-11 18:27   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-11 19:28     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-12  7:21       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-14 12:25         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-01-15  6:23           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-15 18:20             ` Dave Martin
2013-01-16  6:33               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-16 10:03                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-01-16 10:12                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-10  0:20 ` [PATCH 16/16] ARM: vexpress/dcscb: probe via device tree Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10  0:46 ` [PATCH 00/16] big.LITTLE low-level CPU and cluster power management Rob Herring
2013-01-10  5:04   ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-10 23:01 ` Will Deacon
2013-01-14  9:56 ` Joseph Lo [this message]
2013-01-14 14:05   ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-15  2:44     ` Joseph Lo
2013-01-15 16:44       ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-16 16:02         ` Catalin Marinas
2013-01-16 21:18           ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-01-17 17:55             ` Catalin Marinas
2013-01-15 18:31     ` Dave Martin
2013-03-07  8:27 ` Pavel Machek
2013-03-07  9:12   ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-03-07  9:40     ` Pavel Machek
2013-03-07  9:56       ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-03-07 14:51         ` Pavel Machek
2013-03-07 15:42           ` Nicolas Pitre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1358157392.19304.243.camel@jlo-ubuntu-64.nvidia.com \
    --to=josephl@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).