From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rogerq@ti.com (Roger Quadros) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:37:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v9 07/20] mfd: omap-usb-tll: Check for missing platform data in probe In-Reply-To: <1358937492-8129-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> References: <1358937492-8129-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> Message-ID: <1358937492-8129-8-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org No need to check for missing platform data in runtime_suspend/resume as it makes more sense to do it in the probe function. Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi --- drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c | 15 +++++---------- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c index af67b96..3dbbfea 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c @@ -225,6 +225,11 @@ static int usbtll_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return -ENOMEM; } + if (!pdata) { + dev_err(dev, "Platform data missing\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } + spin_lock_init(&tll->lock); tll->pdata = pdata; @@ -368,11 +373,6 @@ static int usbtll_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) dev_dbg(dev, "usbtll_runtime_resume\n"); - if (!pdata) { - dev_dbg(dev, "missing platform_data\n"); - return -ENODEV; - } - spin_lock_irqsave(&tll->lock, flags); for (i = 0; i < tll->nch; i++) { @@ -404,11 +404,6 @@ static int usbtll_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) dev_dbg(dev, "usbtll_runtime_suspend\n"); - if (!pdata) { - dev_dbg(dev, "missing platform_data\n"); - return -ENODEV; - } - spin_lock_irqsave(&tll->lock, flags); for (i = 0; i < tll->nch; i++) { -- 1.7.4.1