From: david.woodhouse@intel.com (Woodhouse, David)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] arm: use built-in byte swap function
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:46:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359478014.3529.157.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130129083522.GA14302@pd.tnic>
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 09:35 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP
> > -#if GCC_VERSION >= 40400
> > +#if (!defined(__arm__) && GCC_VERSION >= 40400) || \
> > + (defined(__arm__) && GCC_VERSION >= 40600)
>
> There should be no arch-specific stuff in a generic header. I guess
> you probably need to select ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP in an arm-specific
> compiler.h header after checking compiler version...
If we're really going to have many different architectures depending on
different versions of GCC for this (if it wasn't sane to use it from
4.4/4.8 when it got introduced, and depends on some later arch-specific
optimisation), then perhaps we'll have the arch provide the
corresponding required GCC_VERSION for using each of 64/32/16 bit
builtins, instead of just a yes/no flag? Or just define
__HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAPxx__ for itself, perhaps?
In fact we could start by having just the problematic architectures set
__HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAPxx__ for themselves according to whatever criteria
they want, and then if there's scope for consolidating that in the
generic code then we can do so later.
--
Sent with MeeGo's ActiveSync support.
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse at intel.com Intel Corporation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4370 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130129/9fde7c1d/attachment.bin>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-29 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 1:30 [RFC] arm: use built-in byte swap function Kim Phillips
2013-01-29 8:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-29 16:46 ` Woodhouse, David [this message]
2013-01-29 17:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-29 17:55 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-29 18:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-30 10:22 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-31 2:09 ` Kim Phillips
2013-01-31 6:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-31 9:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-31 20:59 ` Kim Phillips
2013-01-31 21:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-31 22:11 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-01 0:37 ` [PATCH v4] " Kim Phillips
2013-02-01 10:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-01 1:17 ` [RFC] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-01 7:33 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-06 3:04 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-06 9:02 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-07 1:19 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-07 10:19 ` Will Newton
2013-02-07 10:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-02-07 18:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-08 17:25 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-08 20:04 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-08 22:40 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-08 22:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-09 1:12 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-09 3:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-20 2:31 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-20 2:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-02-20 3:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-20 10:38 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-20 13:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-20 13:44 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-20 14:06 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-20 14:53 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-02-20 15:43 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-21 3:49 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-21 4:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-21 6:52 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-21 16:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-22 2:33 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-22 3:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-23 1:40 ` [PATCH v6] " Kim Phillips
2013-02-23 2:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-23 23:20 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-05-23 16:46 ` [PATCH v7] " Kim Phillips
2013-05-23 20:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-05-23 23:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-06 22:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-06 22:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-07 0:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-26 5:38 ` Dirk Behme
2013-05-26 9:30 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-10-27 2:41 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-11-05 21:45 ` Kim Phillips
2013-02-21 16:37 ` [RFC] " Woodhouse, David
2013-02-21 17:27 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-03-13 13:35 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-29 14:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-29 14:43 ` Woodhouse, David
2013-01-29 14:53 ` Rob Herring
2013-01-29 15:10 ` Woodhouse, David
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1359478014.3529.157.camel@shinybook.infradead.org \
--to=david.woodhouse@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).