From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: david.woodhouse@intel.com (Woodhouse, David) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:11:25 +0000 Subject: [RFC] arm: use built-in byte swap function In-Reply-To: <20130131145947.f62474a0600848df86548b96@freescale.com> References: <20130128193033.8a0b0a871150c99247f05a95@freescale.com> <20130129083522.GA14302@pd.tnic> <1359478014.3529.157.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20130129174249.GB25415@pd.tnic> <1359482147.3529.161.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20130129181046.GC25415@pd.tnic> <1359541333.3529.186.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20130130200900.9d7cf7908caeaef4ecee1d61@freescale.com> <20130131092801.GV23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130131145947.f62474a0600848df86548b96@freescale.com> Message-ID: <1359670248.27468.13.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 14:59 -0600, Kim Phillips wrote: > > - add new ARCH_DEFINES_BUILTIN_BSWAP (see Kconfig help). Ick, no. > - if set, generic compiler header does not set HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAPxx It won't do that anyway if !ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP. I don't see the point in adding a new config option just for this. If you want to define __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAPxx__ for yourself manually, just go ahead and do so. As I said, if lots of architectures end up doing it then we'll worry about cleaning things up when we've got a better picture of who needs what. -- Sent with MeeGo's ActiveSync support. David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse at intel.com Intel Corporation -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 4370 bytes Desc: not available URL: