From: shawn.guo@linaro.org (Shawn Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: anatop: improve precision of delay time
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:21:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359944492-23130-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> (raw)
For cpufreq example, it takes 13 steps (25 mV for one step) to increase
vddcore from 0.95 V to 1.275 V, and the time of 64 clock cycles at
24 MHz for one step is ~2.67 uS, so the total delay time would be
~34.71 uS. But the current calculation in the driver gives 39 uS.
Change the formula to have the addition of 1 be the last step, so that
we can get a more precise delay time. For example above, the new
formula will give 35 uS.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
---
drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c
index 0df9c6a..0d4a8cc 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/anatop-regulator.c
@@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ static int anatop_regmap_set_voltage_time_sel(struct regulator_dev *reg,
regmap_read(anatop_reg->anatop, anatop_reg->delay_reg, &val);
val = (val >> anatop_reg->delay_bit_shift) &
((1 << anatop_reg->delay_bit_width) - 1);
- ret = (new_sel - old_sel) * ((LDO_RAMP_UP_UNIT_IN_CYCLES <<
- val) / LDO_RAMP_UP_FREQ_IN_MHZ + 1);
+ ret = (new_sel - old_sel) * (LDO_RAMP_UP_UNIT_IN_CYCLES <<
+ val) / LDO_RAMP_UP_FREQ_IN_MHZ + 1;
}
return ret;
--
1.7.9.5
next reply other threads:[~2013-02-04 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-04 2:21 Shawn Guo [this message]
2013-02-04 15:52 ` [PATCH] regulator: anatop: improve precision of delay time Anson Huang
2013-02-08 11:15 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1359944492-23130-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--to=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).