From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: david.woodhouse@intel.com (Woodhouse, David) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 22:40:40 +0000 Subject: [RFC] arm: use built-in byte swap function In-Reply-To: References: <20130129181046.GC25415@pd.tnic> <1359541333.3529.186.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20130130200900.9d7cf7908caeaef4ecee1d61@freescale.com> <20130131092801.GV23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130131145947.f62474a0600848df86548b96@freescale.com> <20130201011712.GF23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1359703995.23531.6.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20130205210436.670c62e26d2121330e87af35@freescale.com> <1360141322.6066.4.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20130206191905.ac8eb6743e69425f30888704@freescale.com> <20130207181315.GM17833@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1360344301.6066.263.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Message-ID: <1360363233.6066.283.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 15:04 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Woodhouse, David wrote: > > > On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 18:13 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > > > However, the biggest reason not to use libgcc is that we want to control > > > what gets used in the kernel - for example, no floating point, and no > > > use of 64 x 64bit division. > > > > Which is all very sensible. But there's no particular reason we couldn't > > add a __bswap[sd]i2 to the kernel's version of libgcc if we wanted to. > > Absolutely. And then ARM can just set ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP like other architectures do, right? -- Sent with MeeGo's ActiveSync support. David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse at intel.com Intel Corporation -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 4370 bytes Desc: not available URL: