* [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add keyword "tegra" to Tegra section
@ 2013-02-08 20:04 Stephen Warren
2013-02-09 0:40 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Warren @ 2013-02-08 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
The intent is to ensure that all Tegra-related patches are sent to the
linux-tegra@ mailing list, so people can keep up-to-date on all misc
driver changes.
Doing this with a keyword is far simpler and more compact than listing
all Tegra-related drivers, even if wildcards were used.
Words such as integrate or integrator are common. Use a negative look-
behind assertion to make sure the keyword doesn't match those.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
---
MAINTAINERS | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 972fd51..ebd3c64 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -7850,9 +7850,7 @@ L: linux-tegra at vger.kernel.org
Q: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/list/
T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/swarren/linux-tegra.git
S: Supported
-F: arch/arm/mach-tegra
-F: arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra*
-F: arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig
+K: (?<!in)tegra
TEHUTI ETHERNET DRIVER
M: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add keyword "tegra" to Tegra section
2013-02-08 20:04 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add keyword "tegra" to Tegra section Stephen Warren
@ 2013-02-09 0:40 ` Joe Perches
2013-02-09 0:47 ` Stephen Warren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2013-02-09 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 13:04 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> (?<!in)tegra
This doesn't work well. It matches too many
words like integral.
I suggest
K: (?:\btegra\b|\bTEGRA_)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add keyword "tegra" to Tegra section
2013-02-09 0:40 ` Joe Perches
@ 2013-02-09 0:47 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-09 1:05 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Warren @ 2013-02-09 0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 02/08/2013 05:40 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 13:04 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> (?<!in)tegra
>
> This doesn't work well. It matches too many
> words like integral.
Hmmm. That's exactly what the (?<!in) negative look-behind assertion is
attempting to avoid. It works fine here. Is there some dependency on
Perl version or something? My Perl version is v5.14.2.
> I suggest
>
> K: (?:\btegra\b|\bTEGRA_)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add keyword "tegra" to Tegra section
2013-02-09 0:47 ` Stephen Warren
@ 2013-02-09 1:05 ` Joe Perches
2013-02-09 3:15 ` Stephen Warren
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2013-02-09 1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 17:47 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 05:40 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 13:04 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> (?<!in)tegra
> >
> > This doesn't work well. It matches too many
> > words like integral.
>
> Hmmm. That's exactly what the (?<!in) negative look-behind assertion is
> attempting to avoid. It works fine here. Is there some dependency on
> Perl version or something? My Perl version is v5.14.2.
Integral matches
I don't see any issue with using a leading \b
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add keyword "tegra" to Tegra section
2013-02-09 1:05 ` Joe Perches
@ 2013-02-09 3:15 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-09 4:02 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Warren @ 2013-02-09 3:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 02/08/2013 06:05 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 17:47 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 02/08/2013 05:40 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 13:04 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>> (?<!in)tegra
>>>
>>> This doesn't work well. It matches too many
>>> words like integral.
>>
>> Hmmm. That's exactly what the (?<!in) negative look-behind assertion is
>> attempting to avoid. It works fine here. Is there some dependency on
>> Perl version or something? My Perl version is v5.14.2.
>
> Integral matches
>
> I don't see any issue with using a leading \b
Oh right, it's a capitalization issue; I only tested with "integral" not
"Integral".
The problem with \btegra is that it wouldn't match _tegra, which would
be useful. Perhaps a custom almost-equivalent (?i)[^a-z]tegra would work?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-09 4:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-08 20:04 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add keyword "tegra" to Tegra section Stephen Warren
2013-02-09 0:40 ` Joe Perches
2013-02-09 0:47 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-09 1:05 ` Joe Perches
2013-02-09 3:15 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-09 4:02 ` Joe Perches
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).