From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:15:37 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: perf: Fix section mismatch on armpmu_init() Message-ID: <1362438937-28143-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xfb80): Section mismatch in reference from the function armpmu_register() to the function .init.text:armpmu_init() The function armpmu_register() references the function __init armpmu_init(). This is often because armpmu_register lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of armpmu_init is wrong. Just drop the __init marking on armpmu_init() because armpmu_register() no longer has an __init marking. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd --- I doubt anyone is actually experiencing any problems because this driver probes before kernel init is over. But the warning is a bit annoying. arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c index 31e0eb3..32081ad 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ const struct dev_pm_ops armpmu_dev_pm_ops = { SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(armpmu_runtime_suspend, armpmu_runtime_resume, NULL) }; -static void __init armpmu_init(struct arm_pmu *armpmu) +static void armpmu_init(struct arm_pmu *armpmu) { atomic_set(&armpmu->active_events, 0); mutex_init(&armpmu->reserve_mutex); -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation