Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: pebolle@tiscali.nl (Paul Bolle)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: drop "select MACH_NOKIA_RM696"
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 18:18:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1362763120.5994.73.camel@x61.thuisdomein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130308161159.GE14552@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi>

On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 18:11 +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 11:29:56AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > When support was added for Nokia N9 (RM-696), with commit
> > 63fc5f3bb3d0ca9ab4767a801b518aa6335f87ad ("ARM: OMAP: add minimal
> > support for Nokia RM-696"), a select statement for MACH_NOKIA_RM696 was
> > added to the tree. But there's no Kconfig symbol with that name. That
> > symbol would be superfluous, since support for that machine piggybacks
> > on MACH_NOKIA_RM680. So drop that select.
> 
> This is needed because of arch/arm/tools/mach-types. See
> include/generated/mach-types.h.

How does that file actually need this select statement?

> If you have just CONFIG_MACH_NOKIA_RM680 and run the kernel on RM-696,
> then machine_is_nokia_rm696() will return false. If I rememeber correctly,
> this broke at least early printk / uncompressor output at the time.
> 
> I guess people may still want to use machine_is_... macros e.g. for
> debugging.

What in the current mainline kernel cares about a
machine_is_nokia_rm696() macro?
    $ git grep -n machine_is_nokia v3.9-rc1
    v3.9-rc1:arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:349:  if (machine_is_nokia_n800() || slot == 0)
    v3.9-rc1:arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:395:  if (machine_is_nokia_n800()) {
    v3.9-rc1:arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:428:  if (machine_is_nokia_n800())
    v3.9-rc1:arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:451:  if (machine_is_nokia_n800()) {
    v3.9-rc1:arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:478:  if (machine_is_nokia_n800())
    v3.9-rc1:arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:493:  if (machine_is_nokia_n810()) {
    v3.9-rc1:arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:544:  if (machine_is_nokia_n810()) {
    v3.9-rc1:arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:562:  if (machine_is_nokia_n810()) {
    v3.9-rc1:arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:714:  if (machine_is_nokia_n810())
    v3.9-rc1:arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-video.c:71:     if (!machine_is_nokia_rx51())
    v3.9-rc1:drivers/usb/host/ohci-omap.c:267:      } else if (machine_is_nokia770()) {
    v3.9-rc1:sound/soc/omap/n810.c:309:     if (!(machine_is_nokia_n810() || machine_is_nokia_n810_wimax()))
    v3.9-rc1:sound/soc/omap/rx51.c:400:     if (!machine_is_nokia_rx51())

    $ git grep -n rm696 v3.9-rc1
    v3.9-rc1:arch/arm/tools/mach-types:589:nokia_rm696		MACH_NOKIA_RM696	NOKIA_RM696		3522

I don't find any actual usage of that macro. Are its uses also
generated? 

> > 0) Tested with "git grep".
> 
> git grep won't search generated source files.

Of course. That's one of the reasons why I explicitly state that I only
tested it that way.

> > 1) Some searching on the web didn't return a "config MACH_NOKIA_RM696".
> > So apparently there's not even a development tree that uses this symbol.
> 
> You can see machine_is_nokia_rm696() used in the public kernel source
> for Nokia N9 product. :-)

Where would that be? And does that tree actually have a Kconfig entry
MACH_NOKIA_RM696?


Paul Bolle

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-08 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-08 10:29 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: drop "select MACH_NOKIA_RM696" Paul Bolle
2013-03-08 16:11 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-03-08 16:35   ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-08 17:20     ` Paul Bolle
2013-03-08 17:55       ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-08 18:02         ` Paul Bolle
2013-03-08 18:10           ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-09  0:01           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-09 19:48             ` Paul Bolle
2013-03-11 16:33               ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-14  8:00                 ` Paul Bolle
2013-03-08 17:18   ` Paul Bolle [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1362763120.5994.73.camel@x61.thuisdomein \
    --to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox