From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pawel.moll@arm.com (Pawel Moll) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:40:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] ARM:vexpress: beautify code, using 'static const' instead of 'const static' In-Reply-To: <513BF001.30204@asianux.com> References: <513BF001.30204@asianux.com> Message-ID: <1363009255.3165.19.camel@hornet> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 02:29 +0000, Chen Gang wrote: > better using 'static const' instead of 'const static' > > Signed-off-by: Chen Gang > --- > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/platsmp.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/platsmp.c > index dc1ace5..9152bf7 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/platsmp.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/platsmp.c > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static struct map_desc vexpress_dt_cortex_a9_scu_map __initdata = { > > static void *vexpress_dt_cortex_a9_scu_base __initdata; > > -const static char *vexpress_dt_cortex_a9_match[] __initconst = { > +static const char *vexpress_dt_cortex_a9_match[] __initconst = { > "arm,cortex-a5-scu", > "arm,cortex-a9-scu", > NULL Thanks for spotting this. I will keep this in mind, but I can't promise to take this patch as it goes, because the platsmp.c is likely to change (shrink) in near future. Either way I'll make sure you get due credit :-) Cheers! Pawel