From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pawel.moll@arm.com (Pawel Moll)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:23:58 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v3 03/11] clocksource: sp804: add device tree support
In-Reply-To: <CAD6h2NTP+X6RVr23Y-XLrQMqHptH974oYooTX=Y6F_Q4hyrmNA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1363151142-32162-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
 <1363151142-32162-4-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
 <1363172730.3100.17.camel@hornet>	<51408A71.9090501@gmail.com>
 <1363185757.3100.66.camel@hornet>	<51409276.8050601@gmail.com>
 <1363186548.3100.75.camel@hornet>
 <CAD6h2NTP+X6RVr23Y-XLrQMqHptH974oYooTX=Y6F_Q4hyrmNA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1363188238.3100.95.camel@hornet>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 14:17 +0000, Rob Herring wrote:
> How about:
> 
> 1 irq - TIMINT1
> 2 irqs w/ same source # - TIMINTC
> 2 irqs w/ different source # - TIMINT1 and TIMINT2

On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 15:11 +0000, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> What's the scenario that we must use TIMINTC? TIMINT1 & TIMINT2 are
> already enough on these two TIMERs. If we really needn't TIMINTC, we
> need to support it. Since it's over-designed.
> 
> If TIMINT1 & TIMINT2 aren't routed, and only TIMINTC is routed. It's another
> case. We can consider it as replacement of TIMINT1.

Just a thought... How to describe a SP804 with only TIMINT2 wired up?

Pawe?