From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: josephl@nvidia.com (Joseph Lo) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:00:08 +0800 Subject: [PATCH V2 2/3] ARM: tegra: get PMC clock source from DT In-Reply-To: <51489513.1020107@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1363594199-10974-1-git-send-email-josephl@nvidia.com> <1363594199-10974-3-git-send-email-josephl@nvidia.com> <51489513.1020107@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <1363773608.5697.8.camel@jlo-ubuntu-64.nvidia.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 00:40 +0800, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/18/2013 02:09 AM, Joseph Lo wrote: > > The clock source of PMC should be PCLK and gotten from DT. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo > > --- > > V2: > > * new in this change > > s/change/series/ ??? > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/common.c > > > void __init tegra_dt_init_irq(void) > > { > > tegra_clocks_init(); > > + tegra_pmc_init(); > > tegra_init_irq(); > > irqchip_init(); > > } > > @@ -100,7 +101,6 @@ void __init tegra_init_early(void) > > tegra_apb_io_init(); > > tegra_init_fuse(); > > tegra_init_cache(); > > - tegra_pmc_init(); > > This change isn't mentioned in the commit description. > > Why is this change needed? We should minimize the amount of code in > tegra_dt_init_irq(), not add more code there. > The clocks only available after tegra_clocks_init(). If I can keep the PMC dt node somewhere in PMC driver, then I can get the clock later. > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pmc.c > > > @@ -151,6 +153,8 @@ static void tegra_pmc_parse_dt(void) > > > > tegra_pmc_invert_interrupt = of_property_read_bool(np, > > "nvidia,invert-interrupt"); > > + tegra_pclk = of_clk_get(np, 0); > > + WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(tegra_pclk)); > > Why WARN_ON_ONCE(); is tegra_pmc_parse_dt() called more than once? > > Can the code continue if IS_ERR(tegra_pclk), or is that fatal? > The code is still OK just want to warn people that the PMC DT node needs PCLK clock info.