From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 26/30] arm64: KVM: 32bit handling of coprocessor traps
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:01:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364317285-20937-27-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364317285-20937-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Provide the necessary infrastructure to trap coprocessor accesses that
occur when running 32bit guests.
Also wire SMC and HVC trapped in 32bit mode while were at it.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h | 5 +
arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 7 ++
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 178 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h
index 0c9e54f..687af6b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_coproc.h
@@ -32,11 +32,16 @@ struct kvm_sys_reg_table {
struct kvm_sys_reg_target_table {
struct kvm_sys_reg_table table64;
+ struct kvm_sys_reg_table table32;
};
void kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(unsigned int target,
struct kvm_sys_reg_target_table *table);
+int kvm_handle_cp14_load_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
+int kvm_handle_cp14_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
+int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
+int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
int kvm_handle_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
#define kvm_coproc_table_init kvm_sys_reg_table_init
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
index fa38230..3e61dcb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -62,6 +62,13 @@ static int kvm_handle_wfi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
static exit_handle_fn arm_exit_handlers[] = {
[ESR_EL2_EC_WFI] = kvm_handle_wfi,
+ [ESR_EL2_EC_CP15_32] = kvm_handle_cp15_32,
+ [ESR_EL2_EC_CP15_64] = kvm_handle_cp15_64,
+ [ESR_EL2_EC_CP14_MR] = kvm_handle_cp14_access,
+ [ESR_EL2_EC_CP14_LS] = kvm_handle_cp14_load_store,
+ [ESR_EL2_EC_CP14_64] = kvm_handle_cp14_access,
+ [ESR_EL2_EC_HVC32] = handle_hvc,
+ [ESR_EL2_EC_SMC32] = handle_smc,
[ESR_EL2_EC_HVC64] = handle_hvc,
[ESR_EL2_EC_SMC64] = handle_smc,
[ESR_EL2_EC_SYS64] = kvm_handle_sys_reg,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index bd1a68d..01a3eab 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -38,6 +38,10 @@
* types are different. My gut feeling is that it should be pretty
* easy to merge, but that would be an ABI breakage -- again. VFP
* would also need to be abstracted.
+ *
+ * For AArch32, we only take care of what is being trapped. Anything
+ * that has to do with init and userspace access has to go via the
+ * 64bit interface.
*/
/* 3 bits per cache level, as per CLIDR, but non-existent caches always 0 */
@@ -163,6 +167,16 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
{ Op0(0b01), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b0111), CRm(0b1110), Op2(0b010),
access_dcsw },
+ /* TEECR32_EL1 */
+ { Op0(0b10), Op1(0b010), CRn(0b0000), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b000),
+ NULL, reset_val, TEECR32_EL1, 0 },
+ /* TEEHBR32_EL1 */
+ { Op0(0b10), Op1(0b010), CRn(0b0001), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b000),
+ NULL, reset_val, TEEHBR32_EL1, 0 },
+ /* DBGVCR32_EL2 */
+ { Op0(0b10), Op1(0b100), CRn(0b0000), CRm(0b0111), Op2(0b000),
+ NULL, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
+
/* MPIDR_EL1 */
{ Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b0000), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b101),
NULL, reset_mpidr, MPIDR_EL1 },
@@ -273,6 +287,39 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
/* TPIDRRO_EL0 */
{ Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1101), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b011),
NULL, reset_unknown, TPIDRRO_EL0 },
+
+ /* DACR32_EL2 */
+ { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b100), CRn(0b0011), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b000),
+ NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
+ /* IFSR32_EL2 */
+ { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b100), CRn(0b0101), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b001),
+ NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
+ /* FPEXC32_EL2 */
+ { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b100), CRn(0b0101), CRm(0b0011), Op2(0b000),
+ NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x70 },
+};
+
+/* Trapped cp15 registers */
+static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
+ /*
+ * DC{C,I,CI}SW operations:
+ */
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm( 6), Op2( 2), access_dcsw },
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm(10), Op2( 2), access_dcsw },
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm(14), Op2( 2), access_dcsw },
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 0), pm_fake },
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), pm_fake },
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), pm_fake },
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), pm_fake },
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 5), pm_fake },
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 6), pm_fake },
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 7), pm_fake },
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(13), Op2( 0), pm_fake },
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(13), Op2( 1), pm_fake },
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(13), Op2( 2), pm_fake },
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 0), pm_fake },
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 1), pm_fake },
+ { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 2), pm_fake },
};
/* Target specific emulation tables */
@@ -285,13 +332,20 @@ void kvm_register_target_sys_reg_table(unsigned int target,
}
/* Get specific register table for this target. */
-static const struct sys_reg_desc *get_target_table(unsigned target, size_t *num)
+static const struct sys_reg_desc *get_target_table(unsigned target,
+ bool mode_is_64,
+ size_t *num)
{
struct kvm_sys_reg_target_table *table;
table = target_tables[target];
- *num = table->table64.num;
- return table->table64.table;
+ if (mode_is_64) {
+ *num = table->table64.num;
+ return table->table64.table;
+ } else {
+ *num = table->table32.num;
+ return table->table32.table;
+ }
}
static const struct sys_reg_desc *find_reg(const struct sys_reg_params *params,
@@ -319,13 +373,123 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc *find_reg(const struct sys_reg_params *params,
return NULL;
}
+int kvm_handle_cp14_load_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
+{
+ kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
+ return 1;
+}
+
+int kvm_handle_cp14_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
+{
+ kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static int emulate_cp15(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_params *params)
+{
+ size_t num;
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *table, *r;
+
+ table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, false, &num);
+
+ /* Search target-specific then generic table. */
+ r = find_reg(params, table, num);
+ if (!r)
+ r = find_reg(params, cp15_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(cp15_regs));
+
+ if (likely(r)) {
+ /* If we don't have an accessor, we should never get here! */
+ BUG_ON(!r->access);
+
+ if (likely(r->access(vcpu, params, r))) {
+ /* Skip instruction, since it was emulated */
+ kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
+ return 1;
+ }
+ /* If access function fails, it should complain. */
+ } else {
+ kvm_err("Unsupported guest CP15 access at: %08lx\n",
+ *vcpu_pc(vcpu));
+ print_sys_reg_instr(params);
+ }
+ kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
+ return 1;
+}
+
+/**
+ * kvm_handle_cp15_64 -- handles a mrrc/mcrr trap on a guest CP15 access
+ * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
+ * @run: The kvm_run struct
+ */
+int kvm_handle_cp15_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
+{
+ struct sys_reg_params params;
+ u32 hsr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu);
+ int Rt2 = (hsr >> 10) & 0xf;
+ int ret;
+
+ params.CRm = (hsr >> 1) & 0xf;
+ params.Rt = (hsr >> 5) & 0xf;
+ params.is_write = ((hsr & 1) == 0);
+
+ params.Op0 = 0;
+ params.Op1 = (hsr >> 16) & 0xf;
+ params.Op2 = 0;
+ params.CRn = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Massive hack here. Store Rt2 in the top 32bits so we only
+ * have one register to deal with. As we use the same trap
+ * backends between AArch32 and AArch64, we get away with it.
+ */
+ if (params.is_write) {
+ u64 val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, params.Rt);
+ val &= 0xffffffff;
+ val |= *vcpu_reg(vcpu, Rt2) << 32;
+ *vcpu_reg(vcpu, params.Rt) = val;
+ }
+
+ ret = emulate_cp15(vcpu, ¶ms);
+
+ /* Reverse hack here */
+ if (ret && !params.is_write) {
+ u64 val = *vcpu_reg(vcpu, params.Rt);
+ val >>= 32;
+ *vcpu_reg(vcpu, Rt2) = val;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * kvm_handle_cp15_32 -- handles a mrc/mcr trap on a guest CP15 access
+ * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
+ * @run: The kvm_run struct
+ */
+int kvm_handle_cp15_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
+{
+ struct sys_reg_params params;
+ u32 hsr = kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu);
+
+ params.CRm = (hsr >> 1) & 0xf;
+ params.Rt = (hsr >> 5) & 0xf;
+ params.is_write = ((hsr & 1) == 0);
+ params.CRn = (hsr >> 10) & 0xf;
+ params.Op0 = 0;
+ params.Op1 = (hsr >> 14) & 0x7;
+ params.Op2 = (hsr >> 17) & 0x7;
+
+ return emulate_cp15(vcpu, ¶ms);
+}
+
static int emulate_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
const struct sys_reg_params *params)
{
size_t num;
const struct sys_reg_desc *table, *r;
- table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, &num);
+ table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, true, &num);
/* Search target-specific then generic table. */
r = find_reg(params, table, num);
@@ -430,7 +594,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc *index_to_sys_reg_desc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (!index_to_params(id, ¶ms))
return NULL;
- table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, &num);
+ table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, true, &num);
r = find_reg(¶ms, table, num);
if (!r)
r = find_reg(¶ms, sys_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(sys_reg_descs));
@@ -750,7 +914,7 @@ static int walk_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uind)
size_t num;
/* We check for duplicates here, to allow arch-specific overrides. */
- i1 = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, &num);
+ i1 = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, true, &num);
end1 = i1 + num;
i2 = sys_reg_descs;
end2 = sys_reg_descs + ARRAY_SIZE(sys_reg_descs);
@@ -862,7 +1026,7 @@ void kvm_reset_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/* Generic chip reset first (so target could override). */
reset_sys_reg_descs(vcpu, sys_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(sys_reg_descs));
- table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, &num);
+ table = get_target_table(vcpu->arch.target, true, &num);
reset_sys_reg_descs(vcpu, table, num);
for (num = 1; num < NR_SYS_REGS; num++)
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-26 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-26 17:00 [PATCH v2 00/30] Port of KVM to arm64 Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/30] arm64: add explicit symbols to ESR_EL1 decoding Marc Zyngier
2013-03-27 13:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-03-27 14:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/30] arm64: KVM: define HYP and Stage-2 translation page flags Marc Zyngier
2013-03-27 14:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-03-27 14:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/30] arm64: KVM: HYP mode idmap support Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/30] arm64: KVM: EL2 register definitions Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 05/30] arm64: KVM: system register definitions for 64bit guests Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/30] arm64: KVM: Basic ESR_EL2 helpers and vcpu register access Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/30] arm64: KVM: fault injection into a guest Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/30] arm64: KVM: architecture specific MMU backend Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/30] arm64: KVM: user space interface Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/30] arm64: KVM: system register handling Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/30] arm64: KVM: CPU specific system registers handling Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 12/30] arm64: KVM: virtual CPU reset Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 13/30] arm64: KVM: kvm_arch and kvm_vcpu_arch definitions Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 14/30] arm64: KVM: MMIO access backend Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 15/30] arm64: KVM: guest one-reg interface Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 16/30] arm64: KVM: hypervisor initialization code Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 17/30] arm64: KVM: HYP mode world switch implementation Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 18/30] arm64: KVM: Exit handling Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 19/30] arm64: KVM: Plug the VGIC Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 20/30] arm64: KVM: Plug the arch timer Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 21/30] arm64: KVM: PSCI implementation Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 22/30] arm64: KVM: Build system integration Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 23/30] arm64: KVM: define 32bit specific registers Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 24/30] arm64: KVM: 32bit GP register access Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 25/30] arm64: KVM: 32bit conditional execution emulation Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 27/30] arm64: KVM: CPU specific 32bit coprocessor access Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 28/30] arm64: KVM: 32bit specific register world switch Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 29/30] arm64: KVM: 32bit guest fault injection Marc Zyngier
2013-03-26 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 30/30] arm64: KVM: enable initialization of a 32bit vcpu Marc Zyngier
2013-03-29 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/30] Port of KVM to arm64 Christopher Covington
2013-03-29 18:37 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1364317285-20937-27-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).