From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:43:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v5 0/8] Reset controller API to reset IP modules on i.MX5 and i.MX6 In-Reply-To: <201303262213.39068.marex@denx.de> References: <1364231189-12497-1-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> <20130326181909.GA31593@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <201303262213.39068.marex@denx.de> Message-ID: <1364373790.5442.5.camel@pizza.hi.pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Marek, thanks for the review. Am Dienstag, den 26.03.2013, 22:13 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut: > Dear Pavel Machek, > > > Hi! > > > > > The system reset controller (SRC) on i.MX51, i.MX53, and i.MX6q controls > > > reset lines to the GPU, VPU, IPU, and OpenVG IP modules. > > > > > > The following patches add a simple API for devices to request being reset > > > by separate reset controller hardware and implements the reset signal > > > device tree binding proposed by Stephen Warren. Contrary to Tegra > > > hardware, the i.MX SRC contains self-deasserting reset registers, so > > > I've included both ops to manually assert/deassert a reset line, as well > > > as a "reset" operation that is supposed to assert the reset line and > > > wait for it to deassert. > > > > > > The i.MX SRC is enhanced to provide a reset controller and the IPU driver > > > is made to request being reset by calling the device_reset(&pdev->dev) > > > convenience wrapper during probing. > > > > > > Changes since v4: > > > - removed flags parameter from .of_xlate / of_reset_simple_xlate > > > - warn also if reset_spec->args_count > rcdev->of_reset_n_cells > > > - unlock list mutex only after try_module_get > > > - tighten devm_reset_control_match a bit > > > > Series looks mostly ok to me. (Should the last patch be actually > > first, so that reset functionality is kept between 5/8 and 8/8?) > > Not first, but rather third. > > You can add my > Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut The gpio-reset driver is not used yet, so there are no ordering limitations. Still, grouping them together as you suggest sounds sensible to me. regards Philipp