From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mathias@openismus.com (Mathias Hasselmann)
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 23:59:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: imx: add initial imx6dl support
In-Reply-To: <1364913079-26039-4-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org>
References: <1364913079-26039-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org>
 <1364913079-26039-4-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <1365371979.4457.4.camel@smarty>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Am Dienstag, den 02.04.2013, 22:31 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mxc.h b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mxc.h
> index 7dce17a..8629e5b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mxc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mxc.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
>  #define MXC_CPU_MX35		35
>  #define MXC_CPU_MX51		51
>  #define MXC_CPU_MX53		53
> +#define MXC_CPU_IMX6DL		0x61
> +#define MXC_CPU_IMX6Q		0x63
>  
>  #define IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0		0x10
>  #define IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1		0x11

Hi Shawn,

Are the hexadecimal values for MXC_CPU_IMX6DL and MXC_CPU_IMX6Q correct?
I ask because Freescale's imx_3.0.35_1.1.0 kernel defines MXC_CPU_MX6DL
and MXC_CPU_MX6Q with the decimal numbers 61 and 63.

Ciao,
Mathias