From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tixy@linaro.org (Jon Medhurst (Tixy)) Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 18:28:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 15/15] ARM: vexpress: Select multi-cluster SMP operation if required In-Reply-To: References: <1360041732-17936-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <1360041732-17936-16-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <20130405224819.GB14308@quad.lixom.net> <1365412211.3384.16.camel@linaro1.home> <1365487246.3292.3.camel@computer5.home> Message-ID: <1365528523.3434.105.camel@linaro1.home> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 12:34 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > > On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 01:41 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > Do the changes to the above mcpm files want to be in a separate patch as > > > > it's generic ARM code, not vexpress specific? > > > > > > Well, since it was so trivial I didn't do it, but the split might be a > > > good idea nevertheless. So I inserted the following patch in the > > > series, and corresponding changes are now removed from the patch above. > > > What do you think? > > > > Looks fine. > > May I add your ACK? Yes, Acked-by: Jon Medhurst > > Did you miss my other comment about smp_ops not looking like they were > > getting set in the case of mcpm_smp_set_ops not getting called? > > You are right. See my change to #14/15 to fix that. > > The VExpress patch now becomes this (only change is the return value): > > Author: Jon Medhurst > Date: Wed Jan 30 09:12:55 2013 +0000 > > ARM: vexpress: Select multi-cluster SMP operation if required > > Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre > Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar > Acked-by: Pawel Moll > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/core.h b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/core.h > index f134cd4a85..bde4374ab6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/core.h > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/core.h > @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ > > void vexpress_dt_smp_map_io(void); > > +bool vexpress_smp_init_ops(void); > + > extern struct smp_operations vexpress_smp_ops; > > extern void vexpress_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu); > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/platsmp.c > index dc1ace55d5..f31a7af712 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/platsmp.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/platsmp.c > @@ -12,9 +12,11 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > > +#include > #include > #include > > @@ -203,3 +205,21 @@ struct smp_operations __initdata vexpress_smp_ops = { > .cpu_die = vexpress_cpu_die, > #endif > }; > + > +bool __init vexpress_smp_init_ops(void) > +{ > +#ifdef CONFIG_MCPM > + /* > + * The best way to detect a multi-cluster configuration at the moment > + * is to look for the presence of a CCI in the system. > + * Override the default vexpress_smp_ops if so. > + */ > + struct device_node *node; > + node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,cci"); > + if (node && of_device_is_available(node)) { > + mcpm_smp_set_ops(); > + return true; > + } > +#endif > + return false; > +} > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c > index 915683cb67..16b42c10e0 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c > @@ -476,6 +476,7 @@ static const char * const v2m_dt_match[] __initconst = { > DT_MACHINE_START(VEXPRESS_DT, "ARM-Versatile Express") > .dt_compat = v2m_dt_match, > .smp = smp_ops(vexpress_smp_ops), > + .smp_init = smp_init_ops(vexpress_smp_init_ops), > .map_io = v2m_dt_map_io, > .init_early = v2m_dt_init_early, > .init_irq = irqchip_init, > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel