From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com (James Bottomley) Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 06:55:54 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 10/21] [SCSI] nsp32: use mdelay instead of large udelay constants In-Reply-To: <201304291521.14195.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1366910944-3033663-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1366910944-3033663-11-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <201304291521.14195.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <1367416554.4791.8.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 15:21 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 26 April 2013, Masanori Goto wrote: > > 2013/4/25 Arnd Bergmann > > > > > > ARM cannot handle udelay for more than 2 miliseconds, so we > > > should use mdelay instead for those. > > > > > > > Singed-off-by: GOTO Masanori > > Thanks. I assume you mean "Acked-by", not "Singed-off" as in "burnt" > or "Signed-off" as a notification that you have applied it to your > own git tree. > > I'll keep the patch with an your "Acked-by" line in my tree unless > James wants to apply to the scsi tree. I can, certainly. I'll be sending the first scsi set today, but I'll be doing another one for just before the close of the merge window. Goto-san, while I have your attention, is the nsp_cs driver orphaned? I know it's not your driver, but you did once work with its author (YOKOTA Hiroshi ) and I'm trying to get some cleanup on the static functions in the header files. Thanks, James