From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (Andy Shevchenko) Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:31:00 +0300 Subject: dmatest regression in 3.10-rc1 In-Reply-To: <20130520095857.GI31359@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20130515152803.GL23869@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <20130516153553.GI11706@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <20130517123423.GR14863@intel.com> <20130517141857.GM23112@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <1369036354.29283.115.camel@smile> <20130520095857.GI31359@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <1369139460.29283.147.camel@smile> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 10:58 +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Sure. They way I trigger it is to unload the module whilst the DMA is > ongoing (I'm using a software model, so I can make the DMA nice and slow -- > I guess you could try using some large buffers). Thank you for the script. It looks like I managed to reproduce it with help of your script. I'm about to send the patch. I will appreciate to collect a Tested-by tags in case it solves the issue. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy