From: steve.capper@linaro.org (Steve Capper)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: mm: correct pte_same behaviour for LPAE.
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 16:31:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369323080-9673-2-git-send-email-steve.capper@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369323080-9673-1-git-send-email-steve.capper@linaro.org>
For 3 levels of paging the PTE_EXT_NG bit will be set for user
address ptes that are written to a page table but not for ptes
created with mk_pte.
This can cause some comparison tests made by pte_same to fail
spuriously and lead to other problems.
To correct this behaviour, we mask off PTE_EXT_NG for any pte that
is present before running the comparison.
Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <steve.capper@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
index 86b8fe3..70f041c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
@@ -166,6 +166,23 @@ static inline pmd_t *pmd_offset(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr)
clean_pmd_entry(pmdp); \
} while (0)
+/*
+ * For 3 levels of paging the PTE_EXT_NG bit will be set for user address ptes
+ * that are written to a page table but not for ptes created with mk_pte.
+ *
+ * In hugetlb_no_page, a new huge pte (new_pte) is generated and passed to
+ * hugetlb_cow, where it is compared with an entry in a page table.
+ * This comparison test fails erroneously leading ultimately to a memory leak.
+ *
+ * To correct this behaviour, we mask off PTE_EXT_NG for any pte that is
+ * present before running the comparison.
+ */
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SAME
+#define pte_same(pte_a,pte_b) ((pte_present(pte_a) ? pte_val(pte_a) & ~PTE_EXT_NG \
+ : pte_val(pte_a)) \
+ == (pte_present(pte_b) ? pte_val(pte_b) & ~PTE_EXT_NG \
+ : pte_val(pte_b)))
+
#define set_pte_ext(ptep,pte,ext) cpu_set_pte_ext(ptep,__pte(pte_val(pte)|(ext)))
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-23 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-23 15:31 [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: mm: HugeTLB + THP support Steve Capper
2013-05-23 15:31 ` Steve Capper [this message]
2013-05-24 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: mm: correct pte_same behaviour for LPAE Catalin Marinas
2013-05-23 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ARM: mm: Add support for flushing HugeTLB pages Steve Capper
2013-05-24 11:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-23 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: mm: HugeTLB support for LPAE systems Steve Capper
2013-05-24 11:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-05-28 8:59 ` Steve Capper
2013-05-23 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: mm: Transparent huge page " Steve Capper
2013-06-03 10:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: mm: HugeTLB + THP support Steve Capper
2013-06-04 12:56 ` Steve Capper
2013-06-04 13:03 ` Will Deacon
2013-06-04 13:13 ` Steve Capper
2013-06-04 14:37 ` Steve Capper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1369323080-9673-2-git-send-email-steve.capper@linaro.org \
--to=steve.capper@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).