From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: benh@kernel.crashing.org (Benjamin Herrenschmidt)
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 07:50:06 +1000
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: kirkwood: proper retain MAC address workaround
 on DT ethernet
In-Reply-To: <2255648.0KEmXfjCx5@wuerfel>
References: <1369253042-15082-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
 <51A33447.80305@gmail.com> <1369655404.3557.33.camel@pasglop>
 <2255648.0KEmXfjCx5@wuerfel>
Message-ID: <1369691406.3557.35.camel@pasglop>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 14:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 27 May 2013 21:50:04 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > However, that wouldn't help much with the allocation/leak problem,
> > though at least it would be easier to use. It could also *try* to re-use
> > the current allocation if the new content is of smaller or equal size.
> 
> I thought that dtc tried to aggressively save space by folding identical
> strings. If you tried to reuse a property that had its contents shared
> with another one, you would get interesting results I guess.

It used to be only property names, unless that has changed in recent
dtc. But that's a good point, we probably want a flag in struct property
like we have for nodes, indicating whether it comes from the original
fdt data pool or not.

Cheers,
Ben.