[PATCH] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Declare memcpy config as static

[PATCH] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Declare memcpy config as static

[Fabio Baltieri]

Fix sparse warnings:

drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:81:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_phy' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:95:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_log' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
---

Hi Linus,

just a quick sparse error fixup on the dma driver.

Thanks,
Fabio

 drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
index fa4f9a3..8f72085 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static int dma40_memcpy_channels[] = {
 };
 
 /* Default configuration for physcial memcpy */
-struct stedma40_chan_cfg dma40_memcpy_conf_phy = {
+static struct stedma40_chan_cfg dma40_memcpy_conf_phy = {
 	.mode = STEDMA40_MODE_PHYSICAL,
 	.dir = DMA_MEM_TO_MEM,
 
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct stedma40_chan_cfg dma40_memcpy_conf_phy = {
 };
 
 /* Default configuration for logical memcpy */
-struct stedma40_chan_cfg dma40_memcpy_conf_log = {
+static struct stedma40_chan_cfg dma40_memcpy_conf_log = {
 	.mode = STEDMA40_MODE_LOGICAL,
 	.dir = DMA_MEM_TO_MEM,
 
-- 
1.8.2

[PATCH] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Declare memcpy config as static

[Vinod Koul]

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> Fix sparse warnings:
> 
> drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:81:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_phy' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:95:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_log' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>

I guess this would be dependent on recent ste_dma40 patches so best way is
Linus's tree, right?

--
~Vinod
> ---
> 
> Hi Linus,
> 
> just a quick sparse error fixup on the dma driver.
> 
> Thanks,
> Fabio
> 
>  drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> index fa4f9a3..8f72085 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static int dma40_memcpy_channels[] = {
>  };
>  
>  /* Default configuration for physcial memcpy */
> -struct stedma40_chan_cfg dma40_memcpy_conf_phy = {
> +static struct stedma40_chan_cfg dma40_memcpy_conf_phy = {
>  	.mode = STEDMA40_MODE_PHYSICAL,
>  	.dir = DMA_MEM_TO_MEM,
>  
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct stedma40_chan_cfg dma40_memcpy_conf_phy = {
>  };
>  
>  /* Default configuration for logical memcpy */
> -struct stedma40_chan_cfg dma40_memcpy_conf_log = {
> +static struct stedma40_chan_cfg dma40_memcpy_conf_log = {
>  	.mode = STEDMA40_MODE_LOGICAL,
>  	.dir = DMA_MEM_TO_MEM,
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.2
> 

-- 

[PATCH] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Declare memcpy config as static

[Fabio Baltieri]

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 08:40:00AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> > Fix sparse warnings:
> > 
> > drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:81:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_phy' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:95:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_log' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
> 
> I guess this would be dependent on recent ste_dma40 patches so best way is
> Linus's tree, right?

Yes, but I'm not sure Linus is going to send a third pull request for
dma40 so maybe I should just resend my last two dma40 patches for
arm-soc directly.

Thanks for the Ack.

Fabio

-- 
Fabio Baltieri

[PATCH] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Declare memcpy config as static

[Linus Walleij]

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Fabio Baltieri
<fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 08:40:00AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
>> > Fix sparse warnings:
>> >
>> > drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:81:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_phy' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> > drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:95:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_log' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
>> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
>>
>> I guess this would be dependent on recent ste_dma40 patches so best way is
>> Linus's tree, right?
>
> Yes, but I'm not sure Linus is going to send a third pull request for
> dma40 so maybe I should just resend my last two dma40 patches for
> arm-soc directly.

I've stacked it in my tree, I didn't plan to send another pull
request but I guess I have to, or I'll send it as fixes, so I'm
taking care of this.

Yours,
Linus Walleij