From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dwmw2@infradead.org (David Woodhouse) Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 21:03:09 +0100 Subject: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?] In-Reply-To: References: <20130725175702.GC22291@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <2007664.vYsECFSKrV@flatron> <51F39FD8.6080808@broadcom.com> <2460092.aLmjrOVh1g@flatron> <51F3A82E.2000907@broadcom.com> Message-ID: <1374955389.2923.101.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 16:01 -0400, jonsmirl at gmail.com wrote: > > Much cleaner to modify dtc to take a schema as part of the compilation > process. The schema language itself has no requirement to look like > DTS syntax. Whoever wrote dtc probably has a favorite language that > would be good for writing schemas in. Yes, we *definitely* want dtc to be doing the validation when it builds trees. And warning (and needing an additional and suitably scarily named command line option) if you try to build something *without* a schema. -- dwmw2 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5745 bytes Desc: not available URL: