From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dwmw2@infradead.org (David Woodhouse) Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 09:27:32 +0100 Subject: Defining schemas for Device Tree In-Reply-To: References: <2469263.vMN09Q7Tzi@flatron> Message-ID: <1375086452.2923.106.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 21:30 -0400, jonsmirl at gmail.com wrote: > Imagine what might be possible with device trees in a few years... > > A single kernel image can load on any embedded system. The device tree > sorts out all of the driver loading and tells how everything is wired > together. There is zero board specific code in the kernel. We're > getting close to this one. Weren't we doing this years ago on PowerPC? I'm sure I've heard of Freescale bringing up a new SoC without touching a line of kernel code. -- dwmw2 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5745 bytes Desc: not available URL: