linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] refactor some ldb related clocks
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:43:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1376991823.4000.22.camel@pizza.hi.pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376987932-5540-1-git-send-email-Ying.Liu@freescale.com>

Am Dienstag, den 20.08.2013, 16:38 +0800 schrieb Liu Ying:
> The ldb_di[0/1]_ipu_div clock dividers in the CSCMR2 register
> of i.MX53, i.MX6Q and i.MX6DL SoCs can be configured to a 1/3.5
> drivider or a 1/7 divider. The common clock framework cannot
> deal with the two dividers directly even with the divider table
> which only supports integral dividers. So, the idea is to take
> the 1/3.5 and 1/7 dividers as separate fixed factor dividers and
> introduce a new multiplexer clock to be derived from the them.
> Then, the ldb display clock trees can be setup correctly.
> This series contains the necessary clock driver changes, dts code
> changes and imx-drm/ldb driver changes to fullfill the task.

I don't see how this improves the situation. Does this solve any real
problem?

While I admit to having introduced the combination of 1/3.5 fixed
divider and configurable 1/1,1/2 divder clocks to describe this
fractional divider for the reasons you state, I think the correct
solution would be to improve the table divider to support fractional
values and get rid of the virtual ldb_di<n>_div_3_5 clocks, not
introduce more virtual clocks.

regards
Philipp

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-20  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-20  8:38 [PATCH 0/3] refactor some ldb related clocks Liu Ying
2013-08-20  8:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx6q: " Liu Ying
2013-08-20 15:40   ` Fabio Estevam
2013-08-20 21:18     ` Mike Turquette
2013-08-21  1:40       ` Shawn Guo
2013-08-21  4:20     ` Liu Ying
2013-08-20  8:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: imx6q/imx6dl: add necessary clocks for ldb node Liu Ying
2013-08-20  8:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] staging: drm/imx: ldb: correct the ldb di clock trees Liu Ying
2013-08-20  9:43 ` Philipp Zabel [this message]
2013-08-20 10:08   ` [PATCH 0/3] refactor some ldb related clocks Liu Ying
2013-08-21  1:59     ` Shawn Guo
2013-08-21  4:12       ` Liu Ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1376991823.4000.22.camel@pizza.hi.pengutronix.de \
    --to=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).