From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: bilhuang@nvidia.com (Bill Huang)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:03:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: tegra: Re-model Tegra cpufreq driver
In-Reply-To: <5230C596.7010000@wwwdotorg.org>
References: <1378898355-31290-1-git-send-email-bilhuang@nvidia.com>
 <1378898355-31290-3-git-send-email-bilhuang@nvidia.com>
 <5230C596.7010000@wwwdotorg.org>
Message-ID: <1378951402.2475.2.camel@bilhuang-vm1>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 03:33 +0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/11/2013 05:19 AM, Bill Huang wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
> 
> > +static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
> > +	{ .frequency = 216000 },
> > +	{ .frequency = 312000 },
> > +	{ .frequency = 456000 },
> > +	{ .frequency = 608000 },
> > +	{ .frequency = 760000 },
> > +	{ .frequency = 816000 },
> > +	{ .frequency = 912000 },
> > +	{ .frequency = 1000000 },
> > +	{ .frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END },
> > +};
> 
> Should/can we query that list from the clock driver?
> 
It's not easy to query that list from clock driver so I'll leave it as
it was. I'll take all the other comments, thanks.